Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorKamusella, Tomasz Dominik
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-08T11:30:24Z
dc.date.available2018-01-08T11:30:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.citationKamusella , T D 2017 , ' The Arabic language : a Latin of modernity? ' , Journal of Nationalism, Memory and Language Politics , vol. 11 , no. 2 , pp. 117-145 . https://doi.org/10.1515/jnmlp-2017-0006en
dc.identifier.issn2570-5857
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 251883644
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: b9b3b007-4263-411f-88d6-aac51e811e65
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85040464415
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-3484-8352/work/42102721
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/12443
dc.description.abstractStandard Arabic is directly derived from the language of the Quran. The Arabic language of the holy book of Islam is seen as the prescriptive benchmark of correctness for the use and standardization of Arabic. As such, this standard language is removed from the vernaculars over a millennium years, which Arabic-speakers employ nowadays in everyday life. Furthermore, standard Arabic is used for written purposes but very rarely spoken, which implies that there are no native speakers of this language. As a result, no speech community of standard Arabic exists. Depending on the region or state, Arabs (understood here as Arabic speakers) belong to over 20 different vernacular speech communities centered around Arabic dialects. This feature is unique among the so-called “large languages” of the modern world. However, from a historical perspective, it can be likened to the functioning of Latin as the sole (written) language in Western Europe until the Reformation and in Central Europe until the mid-19th century. After the seventh to ninth century, there was no Latin-speaking community, while in day-to-day life, people who employed Latin for written use spoke vernaculars. Afterward these vernaculars replaced Latin in written use also, so that now each recognized European language corresponds to a speech community. In future, faced with the demands of globalization, the diglossic nature of Arabic may yet yield a ternary polyglossia (triglossia): with the vernacular for everyday life; standard Arabic for formal texts, politics, and religion; and a western language (English, French, or Spanish) for science, business technology, and the perusal of belles-lettres.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Nationalism, Memory and Language Politicsen
dc.rights© 2017 Tomasz Kamusella. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en
dc.subjectArabicen
dc.subjectVernacularsen
dc.subjectHoly booken
dc.subjectDiglossiaen
dc.subjectSpeech communityen
dc.subjectLatinen
dc.subjectModernityen
dc.subjectPolyglossiaen
dc.subjectStandard languageen
dc.subjectP Language and Literatureen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccPen
dc.titleThe Arabic language : a Latin of modernity?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1515/jnmlp-2017-0006
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record