St Andrews Research Repository

View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Variation in reproductive success across captive populations : methodological differences, potential biases and opportunities

View/Open
Griffithetal_Ethology_Breeding_Failure_150826_AM.pdf (474.4Kb)
Date
01/2017
Author
Griffith, Simon C.
Crino, Ondi L.
Andrew, Samuel C.
Nomano, Fumiaki Y.
Adkins-Regan, Elizabeth
Alonso-Alvarez, Carlos
Bailey, Ida E.
Bittner, Stephanie S.
Bolton, Peri E.
Boner, Winnie
Boogert, Neeltje
Boucaud, Ingrid C. A.
Briga, Michael
Buchanan, Katherine L.
Caspers, Barbara A.
Cichoń, Mariusz
Clayton, David F.
Derégnaucourt, Sebastien
Forstmeier, Wolfgang
Guillette, Lauren M.
Hartley, Ian R.
Healy, Susan D.
Hill, Davina L.
Holveck, Marie-Jeanne
Hurley, Laura L.
Ihle, Malika
Krause, E. Tobias
Mainwaring, Mark C.
Marasco, Valeria
Mariette, Marlene M.
Martin-Wintle, Meghan S.
McCowan, Luke S. C.
McMahon, Maeve
Monaghan, Pat
Nager, Ruedi G.
Naguib, Marc
Nord, Andreas
Potvin, Dominique A.
Prior, Nora H.
Riebel, Katharina
Romero-Haro, Ana A.
Royle, Nick J.
Rutkowska, Joanna
Schuett, Wiebke
Swaddle, John P.
Tobler, Michael
Trompf, Larissa
Varian-Ramos, Claire W.
Vignal, Clémentine
Villain, Avelyne S.
Williams, Tony D.
Keywords
Taeniopygia guttata
Zebra finch
Reproductive failure
Captivity
Domestication
Husbandry
Model species
Captive breeding
QH301 Biology
NDAS
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Our understanding of fundamental organismal biology has been disproportionately influenced by studies of a relatively small number of ‘model’ species extensively studied in captivity. Laboratory populations of model species are commonly subject to a number of forms of past and current selection that may affect experimental outcomes. Here, we examine these processes and their outcomes in one of the most widely used vertebrate species in the laboratory – the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). This important model species is used for research across a broad range of fields, partly due to the ease with which it can be bred in captivity. However despite this perceived amenability, we demonstrate extensive variation in the success with which different laboratories and studies bred their subjects, and overall only 64% of all females that were given the opportunity, bred successfully in the laboratory. We identify and review several environmental, husbandry, life-history and behavioural factors that potentially contribute to this variation. The variation in reproductive success across individuals could lead to biases in experimental outcomes and drive some of the heterogeneity in research outcomes across studies. The zebra finch remains an excellent captive animal system and our aim is to sharpen the insight that future studies of this species can provide, both to our understanding of this species and also with respect to the reproduction of captive animals more widely. We hope to improve systematic reporting methods and that further investigation of the issues we raise will lead both to advances in our fundamental understanding of avian reproduction as well as to improvements in future welfare and experimental efficiency.
Citation
Griffith , S C , Crino , O L , Andrew , S C , Nomano , F Y , Adkins-Regan , E , Alonso-Alvarez , C , Bailey , I E , Bittner , S S , Bolton , P E , Boner , W , Boogert , N , Boucaud , I C A , Briga , M , Buchanan , K L , Caspers , B A , Cichoń , M , Clayton , D F , Derégnaucourt , S , Forstmeier , W , Guillette , L M , Hartley , I R , Healy , S D , Hill , D L , Holveck , M-J , Hurley , L L , Ihle , M , Krause , E T , Mainwaring , M C , Marasco , V , Mariette , M M , Martin-Wintle , M S , McCowan , L S C , McMahon , M , Monaghan , P , Nager , R G , Naguib , M , Nord , A , Potvin , D A , Prior , N H , Riebel , K , Romero-Haro , A A , Royle , N J , Rutkowska , J , Schuett , W , Swaddle , J P , Tobler , M , Trompf , L , Varian-Ramos , C W , Vignal , C , Villain , A S & Williams , T D 2017 , ' Variation in reproductive success across captive populations : methodological differences, potential biases and opportunities ' Ethology , vol 123 , no. 1 , pp. 1-29 . DOI: 10.1111/eth.12576
Publication
Ethology
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eth.12576
ISSN
0179-1613
Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright © 2016, Wiley Blackwell Verlag GmbH This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12576
Collections
  • Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences Research
  • Biology Research
  • Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/12335

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via PURE, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter