Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorDe Troyer, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorAdcock, James Seth
dc.coverage.spatial353 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T15:03:11Z
dc.date.available2017-10-31T15:03:11Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/11968
dc.description.abstractI wish to argue the following points: 1. MT Jeremiah gives a more complex text form in its more intricate poetic structure and, therefore, represents a more ancient or earlier form of verses 10:1-18. 2. LXX Jeremiah demonstrates later interpretative and textual developments in its logical structure of verses 10:1-18, which gives emphasis to verse 11 in its structural placement of verse 9 within that of verse 5, along with the necessary deletions of verses 10:6-8 and 10. 3. Qumran, apocryphal, and pseudepigraphtical material demonstrate the cultural and scribal milieu that readily explains the alterations evident in the Septuagint text form of 10:1-18. These three primary arguments will be expressed in greater detail in chapters 2, 3, and 4. Chapter 2 concerns the Masoretic text form of 10:1-18 and explicates its text form’s structure. Chapter 3 discusses the Septuagint text form of 10:1-18 and analyzes its textual developments and translation technique. Chapter 4 surveys Second Temple Period Jewish literature that contains the text of Jer 10:1-18 or references its material. I will study Jeremiah 10:1-18 with the traditional tools of textual criticism along with other biblical criticisms as well. In this thesis, I wish to argue that the texts of 4Q71 (4QJerb) and LXX Jer 10 show evidence of a secondary nature in comparison to the MT tradition as reflected in 4Q70 (4QJera). The abbreviation of the passage and the transposition of 10:9 within 10:5 reflected in 4Q71 and LXX 10 demonstrate an easier and later textual variant in comparison to the more original text form of MT Jer 10. I shall observe that 4Q71 and LXX Jer 10:1-18’s alterations to MT’s older text form were done for the sake of attempting to smooth out the logical flow of the pericope.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subject.lccBS1525.A3
dc.subject.lcshBible. Jeremiah X--Criticism, interpretation, etc.en
dc.subject.lcshCriticism, Textualen
dc.titleA comparative study of the Hebrew and Greek text forms of Jeremiah 10:1-18en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2020-10-23
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Print and electronic copy restricted until 23rd October 2020en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record