Barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation in a cancer context : a qualitative study of patient, family and professional views
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Background Continued smoking after cancer adversely affects quality of life and survival, but one fifth of cancer survivors still smoke. Despite its demands, cancer presents an opportunity for positive behaviour change. Smoking often occurs in social groups, therefore interventions which target families and individuals may be more successful. This qualitative study explored patients, family members and health professionals’ views and experiences of smoking and smoking cessation after cancer, in order to inform future interventions. Methods In-depth qualitative interviews (n=67) with 29 patients, 14 family members and 24 health professionals. Data were analysed using the ‘Framework’ method. Results Few patients and family members had used National Health Service (NHS) smoking cessation services and more than half still smoked. Most recalled little ‘smoking-related’ discussion with clinicians but were receptive to talking openly. Clinicians revealed several barriers to discussion. Participants’ continued smoking was explained by the stress of diagnosis; desire to maintain personal control; and lack of connection between smoking, cancer and health. Conclusions A range of barriers to smoking cessation exist for patients and family members. These are insufficiently assessed and considered by clinicians. Interventions must be more effectively integrated into routine practice.
Wells , M , Aitchison , P , Harris , F , Ozakinci , G , Radley , A , Bauld , L , Entwistle , V , Munro , A J , Haw , S , Culbard , B & Williams , B 2017 , ' Barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation in a cancer context : a qualitative study of patient, family and professional views ' , BMC Cancer , vol. 17 , 348 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3344-z
© The Author(s). 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
DescriptionThis study was funded by the Chief Scientist Office, Scotland CZH/4/807.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.