Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Reply_to_Eaton_and_Pickavance.pdf
Size:
30.66Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Reply to Eaton and Pickavance

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWeatherson, Brian James
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-12T00:33:25Z
dc.date.available2017-03-12T00:33:25Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-11
dc.identifier.citationWeatherson , B J 2016 , ' Reply to Eaton and Pickavance ' , Philosophical Studies , pp. 1-3 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0en
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 246879861
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 92701f15-57ed-4594-91d2-51430611e270
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84960447570
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000389806500006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/10456
dc.description.abstractDavid Eaton and Timothy Pickavance argued that interest-relative invariantism has a surprising and interesting consequence. They take this consequence to be so implausible that it refutes interest-relative invariantism. But in fact it is a consequence that any theory of knowledge that has the resources to explain familiar puzzles (such as Gettier cases) must have.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophical Studiesen
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0en
dc.subjectKnowledgeen
dc.subjectInterestsen
dc.subjectGettier casesen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleReply to Eaton and Pickavanceen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2017-03-11


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.