Reply to Eaton and Pickavance
Abstract
David Eaton and Timothy Pickavance argued that interest-relative invariantism has a surprising and interesting consequence. They take this consequence to be so implausible that it refutes interest-relative invariantism. But in fact it is a consequence that any theory of knowledge that has the resources to explain familiar puzzles (such as Gettier cases) must have.
Citation
Weatherson , B J 2016 , ' Reply to Eaton and Pickavance ' , Philosophical Studies , pp. 1-3 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0
Publication
Philosophical Studies
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0031-8116Type
Journal item
Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.