Reply to Eaton and Pickavance
MetadataShow full item record
David Eaton and Timothy Pickavance argued that interest-relative invariantism has a surprising and interesting consequence. They take this consequence to be so implausible that it refutes interest-relative invariantism. But in fact it is a consequence that any theory of knowledge that has the resources to explain familiar puzzles (such as Gettier cases) must have.
Weatherson , B J 2016 , ' Reply to Eaton and Pickavance ' Philosophical Studies , pp. 1-3 . DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.