Reply to Eaton and Pickavance

Weatherson, Brian James

View/Open

Reply_to_Eaton_and_Pickavance.pdf (30.66Kb)

Date

11/03/2016

Altmetrics Handle Statistics

Altmetrics DOI Statistics

Abstract

David Eaton and Timothy Pickavance argued that interest-relative invariantism has a surprising and interesting consequence. They take this consequence to be so implausible that it refutes interest-relative invariantism. But in fact it is a consequence that any theory of knowledge that has the resources to explain familiar puzzles (such as Gettier cases) must have.

Citation

Weatherson , B J 2016 , ' Reply to Eaton and Pickavance ' , Philosophical Studies , pp. 1-3 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0

Publication

Philosophical Studies

Status

Peer reviewed

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0

ISSN

0031-8116

Type

Journal item

Rights

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0660-0

Collections

University of St Andrews Research

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10023/10456