Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFitzRoy, Felix
dc.contributor.authorJin, Jim
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-24T11:30:08Z
dc.date.available2017-02-24T11:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.identifier249184315
dc.identifier39ca7e25-9b73-44be-87c1-479c4d2606f7
dc.identifier85022199325
dc.identifier000411903200002
dc.identifier.citationFitzRoy , F & Jin , J 2017 ' Higher tax for top earners ' School of Economics and Finance Discussion Paper , no. 1702 , University of St Andrews , St Andrews .en
dc.identifier.issn0962-4031
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/10361
dc.description.abstractThe literature can justify increasing and decreasing marginal taxes (IMT & DMT) on top income under different social objectives and income distributions. Even if DMT are optimal, they are often politically infeasible. Then a flat tax seems to be a constrained optimal solution. We show however that, if we want to maximize the utility of a poor majority any flat tax can be inferior to some IMT. We provide a sufficient condition for (two-band) IMT to dominate any flat tax and further generalize this result to allow different welfare weights, declining elasticity of labour supply and more tax bands.
dc.format.extent25
dc.format.extent496796
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSchool of Economics and Finance Discussion Paperen
dc.subjectFlat taxen
dc.subjectIncreasing marginal taxesen
dc.subjectIncome redistributionen
dc.subjectHG Financeen
dc.subjectHB Economic Theoryen
dc.subjectHF5601 Accountingen
dc.subject.lccHGen
dc.subject.lccHBen
dc.subject.lccHF5601en
dc.titleHigher tax for top earnersen
dc.typeWorking or discussion paperen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Economics and Financeen
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ideas.repec.org/p/san/wpecon/1702.htmlen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record