Missing in action? The role of the knowledge mobilisation literature in developing knowledge mobilisation practices
MetadataShow full item record
Despite a burgeoning literature and the development of new theories about knowledge mobilisation in the past 15 years, findings from this online survey in 2014 of over 100 research agencies (n=106; response rate 57%) show the challenges of making effective use of formal and informal learning. Many agencies rely on traditional knowledge ‘push’ activities; formal use of theoretical models and frameworks is patchy; and knowledge-sharing between agencies and the comprehensive evaluation of knowledge mobilisation programmes are limited. Closer links between research agencies, and between these and knowledge mobilisation researchers, could enhance future knowledge mobilisation practice and theory.
Powell , A , Davies , H & Nutley , S 2017 , ' Missing in action? The role of the knowledge mobilisation literature in developing knowledge mobilisation practices ' , Evidence & Policy , vol. 13 , no. 2 , pp. 201-223 . https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14534671325644
Evidence & Policy
Copyright © 2016, Policy Press. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14534671325644
DescriptionThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme (project number 11/2004/10).
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.