Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Differences in phenological responses to climate change among species can desynchronise ecological interactions and thereby threaten ecosystem function. To assess these threats, we must quantify the relative impact of climate change on species at different trophic levels. Here, we apply a Climate Sensitivity Profile approach to 10,003 terrestrial and aquatic phenological data sets, spatially matched to temperature and precipitation data, to quantify variation in climate sensitivity. The direction, magnitude and timing of climate sensitivity varied markedly among organisms within taxonomic and trophic groups. Despite this variability, we detected systematic variation in the direction and magnitude of phenological climate sensitivity. Secondary consumers showed consistently lower climate sensitivity than other groups. We used mid-century climate change projections to estimate that the timing of phenological events could change more for primary consumers than for species in other trophic levels (6.2 versus 2.5–2.9 days earlier on average), with substantial taxonomic variation (1.1–14.8 days earlier on average).
Thackeray , S J , Henrys , P A , Hemming , D , Bell , J R , Botham , M S , Burthe , S , Helaouet , P , Johns , D G , Jones , I D , Leech , D I , Mackay , E B , Massimino , D , Atkinson , S , Bacon , P J , Brereton , T M , Carvalho , L , Clutton-Brock , T H , Duck , C , Edwards , M , Elliott , J M , Hall , S J G , Harrington , R , Pearce-Higgins , J W , Høye , T T , Kruuk , L E B , Pemberton , J M , Sparks , T H , Thompson , P M , White , I , Winfield , I J & Wanless , S 2016 , ' Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels ' , Nature , vol. 535 , no. 7611 , pp. 241-245 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18608
© 2016, Macmillan Publishers Ltd, part of Springer Nature. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at www.nature.com / https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18608
DescriptionThis work was funded by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) grant NE/J02080X/1. The Rothamsted Insect Survey (RIS) is a National Capability strategically funded by BBSRC.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.