Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBecker, Julia
dc.contributor.authorTausch, Nicole
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-03T00:33:49Z
dc.date.available2016-11-03T00:33:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationBecker , J & Tausch , N 2015 , ' A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action : psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers ' , European Review of Social Psychology , vol. 26 , no. 1 , pp. 43-92 . https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265en
dc.identifier.issn1479-277X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 211060589
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 777f57bb-c733-4628-a9da-1d88d2a60c9e
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84983605258
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9471-0673/work/46362122
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000367259400002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/9755
dc.descriptionSome of the research reported in this review was prepared while Nicole Tausch was a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow at Cardiff University (PDF/2007/520). Parts of this research were supported by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-22-3251) awarded to Nicole Tausch and Russell Spears and by a grant from the German Research Foundation awarded to Jenny Roth for a network on “intra- and intergroup processes in the context of social inequality” (RO 4826/1-1).en
dc.description.abstractThis review addresses three recent developments in the collective action literature. First, we demonstrate that normative and non-normative collective action participation can be predicted by different psychological variables. Second, we show that collective action participation has emotional and identity-related consequences for activists that shape their motivation to engage in future action. Third, we illustrate that members of disadvantaged groups are faced with two dilemmas: the dilemma of alternative ways of identity management and the dilemma of affective loyalties towards the outgroup, both of which present barriers to social change by undermining protest intentions. In the final part of the review, we outline an integrative framework that maps out the dynamic processes between antecedents of, barriers to and outcomes of collective action participation and highlight a number of directions for future research.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Review of Social Psychologyen
dc.rights© 2015 European Association of Social Psychology. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Review of Social Psychology on 02/11/2015, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265en
dc.subjectCollective actionen
dc.subjectProtesten
dc.subjectSocial changeen
dc.subjectNon-normative collective actionen
dc.subjectDisadvantaged groupsen
dc.subjectDisidentificationen
dc.subjectIdentity managementen
dc.subjectContacten
dc.subjectTerrorismen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleA dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action : psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriersen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-11-02


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record