St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis : a multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial

Thumbnail
View/Open
Gillespie_2016_LancetID_Tuberculosis_CC.pdf (286.7Kb)
Date
01/2017
Author
Boeree, Martin J.
Heinrich, Norbert
Aarnoutse, Rob
Diacon, Andreas H.
Dawson, Rodney
Rehal, Sunita
Kibiki, Gibson S.
Churchyard, Gavin
Sanne, Ian
Ntinginya, Nyanda E.
Minja, Lilian T.
Hunt, Robert D.
Charalambous, Salome
Hanekom, Madeleine
Semvua, Hadija H.
Mpagama, Stellah G.
Manyama, Christina
Mtafya, Bariki
Reither, Klaus
Wallis, Robert S.
Venter, Amour
Narunsky, Kim
Mekota, Anka
Henne, Sonja
Colbers, Angela
Plemper van Balen, Georgette
Gillespie, Stephen H.
Phillips, Patrick P. J.
Hoelscher, Michael
PanACEA Consortium
Keywords
RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
NDAS
BDC
R2C
~DC~
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Abstract
Background. Tuberculosis is the world's leading infectious disease killer. We aimed to identify shorter, safer drug regimens for the treatment of tuberculosis. Methods. We did a randomised controlled, open-label trial with a multi-arm, multi-stage design. The trial was done in seven sites in South Africa and Tanzania, including hospitals, health centres, and clinical trial centres. Patients with newly diagnosed, rifampicin-sensitive, previously untreated pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1:2 ratio to receive (all orally) either 35 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 15–20 mg/kg ethambutol, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 400 mg moxifloxacin, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, or a daily standard control regimen (10 mg/kg rifampicin, 5 mg/kg isoniazid, 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide, and 15–20 mg/kg ethambutol). Experimental treatments were given with oral 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide per day for 12 weeks, followed by 14 weeks of 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day. Because of the orange discoloration of body fluids with higher doses of rifampicin it was not possible to mask patients and clinicians to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was time to culture conversion in liquid media within 12 weeks. Patients without evidence of rifampicin resistance on phenotypic test who took at least one dose of study treatment and had one positive culture on liquid or solid media before or within the first 2 weeks of treatment were included in the primary analysis (modified intention to treat). Time-to-event data were analysed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model and adjusted for minimisation variables. The proportional hazard assumption was tested using Schoelfeld residuals, with threshold p<0·05 for non-proportionality. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01785186). Findings. Between May 7, 2013, and March 25, 2014, we enrolled and randomly assigned 365 patients to different treatment arms (63 to rifampicin 35 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; 59 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109; 57 to rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and SQ109; 63 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin; and 123 to the control arm). Recruitment was stopped early in the arms containing SQ109 since prespecified efficacy thresholds were not met at the planned interim analysis. Time to stable culture conversion in liquid media was faster in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin group than in the control group (median 48 days vs 62 days, adjusted hazard ratio 1·78; 95% CI 1·22–2·58, p=0·003), but not in other experimental arms. There was no difference in any of the groups in time to culture conversion on solid media. 11 patients had treatment failure or recurrent disease during post-treatment follow-up: one in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin arm and none in the moxifloxacin arm. 45 (12%) of 365 patients reported grade 3–5 adverse events, with similar proportions in each arm. Interpretation.  A dose of 35 mg/kg rifampicin was safe, reduced the time to culture conversion in liquid media, and could be a promising component of future, shorter regimens. Our adaptive trial design was successfully implemented in a multi-centre, high tuberculosis burden setting, and could speed regimen development at reduced cost.
Citation
Boeree , M J , Heinrich , N , Aarnoutse , R , Diacon , A H , Dawson , R , Rehal , S , Kibiki , G S , Churchyard , G , Sanne , I , Ntinginya , N E , Minja , L T , Hunt , R D , Charalambous , S , Hanekom , M , Semvua , H H , Mpagama , S G , Manyama , C , Mtafya , B , Reither , K , Wallis , R S , Venter , A , Narunsky , K , Mekota , A , Henne , S , Colbers , A , Plemper van Balen , G , Gillespie , S H , Phillips , P P J , Hoelscher , M & PanACEA Consortium 2017 , ' High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis : a multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial ' , Lancet Infectious Diseases , vol. 17 , no. 1 , pp. 39-49 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30274-2
Publication
Lancet Infectious Diseases
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30274-2
ISSN
1473-3099
Type
Journal article
Rights
© The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license.
Description
The study was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials partnership (EDCTP), the German Ministry for Education and Research (BmBF), and the Medical Research Council UK (MRC).
Collections
  • University of St Andrews Research
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/9723

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter