Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Alex
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T10:30:12Z
dc.date.available2016-09-13T10:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-08
dc.identifier.citationDavis , A 2016 , ' Between courtesy and constancy : The Faerie Queene , books 6 and 7 ' , English Literary History , vol. 83 , no. 3 , pp. 655-679 . https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2016.0025en
dc.identifier.issn0013-8304
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 178477219
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: d102ca48-ea84-4869-ad80-5872ba6bdb10
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84987723172
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000383116100001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/9490
dc.description.abstractMatthew Lownes’s 1609 edition of The Faerie Queene claims that the Mutabilitie Cantos, printed for the very first time, “appeare to be parcell of some following Booke of the FAERIE QVEENE, VNDER THE LEGEND OF Constancie.” This essay reads the figure of Meliboe, in book 5 of Spenser’s poem, as a spokesperson for the constant, Neostoic world-view, and his debate with Calidore as an exploration of what might be at stake in the transition between courtesy and constancy. It looks at the associations of constancy in late sixteenth-century culture. Finally, it offers a reading of The Mutabilitie Cantos as attempting to reconstitute the features of a constant virtue, in part through a revision of Stoic and Nestoic discourses of property and possession.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnglish Literary Historyen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2016 The Johns Hopkins University Press. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published at https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/elh.2016.0025en
dc.subjectEdmund Spenseren
dc.subjectStoicismen
dc.subjectInheritanceen
dc.subjectThe Faerie Queeneen
dc.subjectPR English literatureen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subject.lccPRen
dc.titleBetween courtesy and constancy : The Faerie Queene, books 6 and 7en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Legal and Constitutional Researchen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Institute of Medieval Studiesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Englishen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2016.0025
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record