Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorVisser, Fleur
dc.contributor.authorCuré, Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorKvadsheim, Petter H.
dc.contributor.authorLam, Frans-Peter A.
dc.contributor.authorTyack, Peter L.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Patrick J O
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-15T16:30:03Z
dc.date.available2016-07-15T16:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-29
dc.identifier.citationVisser , F , Curé , C , Kvadsheim , P H , Lam , F-P A , Tyack , P L & Miller , P J O 2016 , ' Disturbance-specific social responses in long-finned pilot whales, Globicephala melas ' , Scientific Reports , vol. 6 , 28641 . https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28641en
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 244335028
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e7c918d3-e171-4a80-8ace-6a7b09e556bf
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84976611344
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000378693900001
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8409-4790/work/60887807
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/9150
dc.descriptionThe study was funded by the US Office of Naval Research, The Netherlands Ministry of Defence, Norwegian Ministry of Defence and French Ministry of Defence. F.V., C.C., P.K., F.P.L. and P.M. were supported by one or two of these funders. P.T. received funding from the MASTS pooling initiative (The Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland). MASTS is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (grant reference HR09011) and contributing institutions.en
dc.description.abstractSocial interactions among animals can influence their response to disturbance. We investigated responses of long-finned pilot whales to killer whale sound playbacks and two anthropogenic sources of disturbance: Tagging effort and naval sonar exposure. The acoustic scene and diving behaviour of tagged individuals were recorded along with the social behaviour of their groups. All three disturbance types resulted in larger group sizes, increasing social cohesion during disturbance. However, the nature and magnitude of other responses differed between disturbance types. Tagging effort resulted in a clear increase in synchrony and a tendency to reduce surface logging and to become silent (21% of cases), whereas pilot whales increased surface resting during sonar exposure. Killer whale sounds elicited increased calling rates and the aggregation of multiple groups, which approached the sound source together. This behaviour appears to represent a mobbing response, a likely adaptive social defence against predators or competitors. All observed response-Tactics would reduce risk of loss of group coordination, suggesting that, in social pilot whales, this could drive behavioural responses to disturbance. However, the behavioural means used to achieve social coordination depends upon other considerations, which are disturbance-specific.
dc.format.extent11
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reportsen
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material.en
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectGeneralen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleDisturbance-specific social responses in long-finned pilot whales, Globicephala melasen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Sea Mammal Research Uniten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Sound Tags Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Bioacoustics groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep28641
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record