Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRauer, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T12:30:08Z
dc.date.available2016-06-14T12:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2017-01
dc.identifier243084261
dc.identifier1722cee4-6693-4e5e-86f8-f783c1697ed3
dc.identifier84974806890
dc.identifier000392292700011
dc.identifier.citationRauer , C 2017 , ' Mann and gender in Old English prose : a pilot study ' , Neophilologus , vol. 101 , no. 1 , pp. 139-158 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-016-9489-1en
dc.identifier.issn0028-2677
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7593-0152/work/60426833
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8978
dc.description.abstractIt has long been known that OE mann was used in gender-neutral as well as gender-specific contexts. Because of the enormous volume of its attestations in Old English prose, the more precise usage patterns of mann remain, however, largely uncharted, and existing lexicographical tools provide only a basic picture. This article aims to present a preliminary study of the various uses of mann as attested in Old English prose, particularly in its surprisingly consistent use by an individual author, namely that of the ninth-century Old English Martyrology. Patterns emerging from this text are then tested against other prose material. Particular attention is paid to gender-specific usage, examples of which are shown to be exceptional for a word which largely occurs in gender-neutral contexts.
dc.format.extent387168
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofNeophilologusen
dc.subjectOld English literatureen
dc.subjectOld English Martyrologyen
dc.subjectOld English proseen
dc.subjectGenderen
dc.subjectTranslationen
dc.subjectPE Englishen
dc.subject3rd-NDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccPEen
dc.titleMann and gender in Old English prose : a pilot studyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Englishen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Institute of Medieval Studiesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11061-016-9489-1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record