Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCutler, Nick
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Richard
dc.contributor.authorHickson, Katie
dc.contributor.authorStreeter, Richard Thomas
dc.contributor.authorDugmore, Andrew J
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-17T10:30:03Z
dc.date.available2016-05-17T10:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-17
dc.identifier.citationCutler , N , Bailey , R , Hickson , K , Streeter , R T & Dugmore , A J 2016 , ' Vegetation structure influences the retention of airfall tephra in a sub-Arctic landscape ' , Progress in Physical Geography , vol. 40 , no. 5 , pp. 661-675 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316650618en
dc.identifier.issn0309-1333
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 242058086
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5793c932-cffb-460a-b331-2966a387bb6c
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84991687162
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000386007400002
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-2261-4540/work/64697928
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8813
dc.description.abstractVegetation cover mediates a number of important geomorphological processes. However, the effect of different vegetation types on the retention of fine aeolian sediment is poorly understood. We investigated this phenomenon, using the retention of fine, pyroclastic material (tephra) from the 2011 eruption of the Grímsvötn volcano, Iceland, as a case study. We set out to quantify structural variation in different vegetation types and to relate structural metrics to the thickness of recently deposited volcanic ash layers in the sedimentary section. We utilised a combination of vegetation and soil surveys, along with photogrammetric analysis of vegetation structure. We found that indices of plant community composition were a poor proxy for vegetation structure and were largely unrelated to tephra thickness. However, structural metrics, derived from photogrammetric analysis, were clearly related to variations in tephra layer thickness at a landscape scale and tephra layers under shrub patches were significantly thicker than those outside the shrub canopy. We therefore concluded that a) vegetation cover was a critical factor in the retention of fine aeolian sediment for deposit depths up to few centimetres and b) structural variation in vegetation cover played a major role in determining the configuration of tephra deposits in the sedimentary section. These findings have implications for the analysis of ancient volcanic eruptions and archaeological/palaeoenvironmental reconstructions based on the interpretation of tephra deposits. Furthermore, they present the possibility that the detailed form of tephra layers may be used as a proxy for palaeo vegetation structure.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProgress in Physical Geographyen
dc.rightsCopyright The Authors 2016. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309133316650618en
dc.subjectAeolian sedimenten
dc.subjectTephrochronologyen
dc.subjectIcelanden
dc.subjectPhotogrammetric analysisen
dc.subjectVegetation structureen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.titleVegetation structure influences the retention of airfall tephra in a sub-Arctic landscapeen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316650618
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://ppg.sagepub.com/en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record