Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDale, Hannah Louise
dc.contributor.authorOzakinci, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorScott, C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-16T10:30:02Z
dc.date.available2016-05-16T10:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-01
dc.identifier.citationDale , H L , Ozakinci , G & Scott , C 2017 , ' Safe Drive Stay Alive : exploring effectiveness of a real-world driving intervention for pre-drivers and the utility of the health action process approach ' , Injury Prevention , vol. 23 , no. 2 , pp. 109-113 . https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041831en
dc.identifier.issn1353-8047
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 241730533
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 073e4bd0-b3de-4acf-b6c6-3d9cf9dbbe60
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84969257234
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5869-3274/work/27163464
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000397860600007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/8805
dc.description.abstractYoung drivers are greatly overrepresented in road traffic collisions (RTCs) worldwide. Interventions attempt to change driving-related behaviours to reduce injuries and deaths from RTCs. The current study evaluated the effectiveness of the well-established Fife Safe Drive Stay Alive (SDSA) practice-based intervention on determinants of driving behaviour using the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model. Adolescent participants (predominantly pre-drivers) attending the SDSA intervention from schools and colleges in Fife, Scotland, were invited to complete an evaluation at baseline and at 3 months exploring motivational determinants of driving behaviour (e.g. risk perception). Intervention content was examined for behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Eighty-seven participants completed both baseline and follow-up evaluations. The motivational HAPA model variables predicted driving intentions. There was no significant overall effect of the SDSA intervention between baseline and 3 month follow-up. Seven negatively-framed BCTs were utilised in the intervention. The effectiveness of SDSA is questioned, however the study supports the use of the HAPA model in explaining driving intentions and therefore may usefully inform driving interventions.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInjury Preventionen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2016 the Authors. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at injuryprevention.bmj.com / https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041831en
dc.subjectAttitudesen
dc.subjectBehaviouren
dc.subjectPsychologicalen
dc.subjectYouthen
dc.subjectProcess/impact evaluationen
dc.subjectMotor vehicleen
dc.subjectRA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicineen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccRA0421en
dc.titleSafe Drive Stay Alive : exploring effectiveness of a real-world driving intervention for pre-drivers and the utility of the health action process approachen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Health Psychologyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041831
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-05-16


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record