Commentary: Fairness is intuitive
MetadataShow full item record
Cappelen et al. (2015) show that ‘fair’ decisions are quicker than are ‘selfish’ decisions. On this basis, they infer that fairness is ‘intuitive’. We argue that they commit a reverse inference fallacy. One might argue reasonably that, ceteris paribus,intuitive response is faster than deliberative decision—but one may not infer that the faster decision is the more intuitive. We note that fair decisions in their study took on average 38.4 seconds, whereas selfish decisions took 48.5. The decisions were mostly slow, and they do not allow us to discriminate a reflexive response from a consciously controlled decision.
Myrseth , K O & Wollbrant , C E 2016 , ' Commentary: Fairness is intuitive ' , Frontiers in Psychology , vol. 7 , 00654 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00654
Frontiers in Psychology
© 2016 Myrseth and Wollbrant. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.