Files in this item
Consistency in eyewitness reports of aquatic "monsters"
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Paxton, Charles George Mackay | |
dc.contributor.author | Shine, Adrian J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-26T09:30:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-26T09:30:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Paxton , C G M & Shine , A J 2016 , ' Consistency in eyewitness reports of aquatic "monsters" ' , Journal of Scientific Exploration , vol. 30 , no. 1 , pp. 16-26 . < http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/volume-30-number-1-2016 > | en |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 242076337 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 1e669ccf-f9a2-4a4e-80f8-6425feaa07e9 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85027307651 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-9350-3197/work/34033057 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/8676 | |
dc.description.abstract | Little work has been undertaken on the consistency/repeatabilityof reports of natural historical anomalies. Such information is usefulin understanding the reporting process associated with such accountsand distinguishing any underlying biological signal. Here we used intraclasscorrelation as a measure of consistency in descriptions of a variety of quantitative features from a large collection of firsthand accounts of apparentlyunknown aquatic animals (hereafter “monsters”) in each of two differentcases. In the first case, same observer, same encounter (sose), the correlationwas estimated from two different accounts of the same event from thesame witness. In the second case, the correlation was between two differentobservers of the same event (dose). Overall, levels of consistency weresurprisingly high, with length of monster, distance of monster to the witness,and duration of encounter varying between 0.63 and 1. Interestingly,there was no evidence that sose accounts generally had higher consistencythan dose accounts. | |
dc.format.extent | 11 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Scientific Exploration | en |
dc.rights | © 2016, Publisher / the Author(s). This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published at www.scientificexploration.com / http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/volume-30-number-1-2016 | en |
dc.subject | Cryptozoology | en |
dc.subject | Eyewitness testimony | en |
dc.subject | Memory confirmity | en |
dc.subject | Anecdote | en |
dc.subject | QH301 Biology | en |
dc.subject | GE Environmental Sciences | en |
dc.subject | NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | QH301 | en |
dc.subject.lcc | GE | en |
dc.title | Consistency in eyewitness reports of aquatic "monsters" | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statistics | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Institute | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/volume-30-number-1-2016 | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.