Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorVoelter, Christoph Johannes
dc.contributor.authorCall, Josep
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T10:30:06Z
dc.date.available2016-04-19T10:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2014-02
dc.identifier141912844
dc.identifier4370b9fc-f182-4363-850c-9660ec86f33f
dc.identifier000331420600005
dc.identifier84889594630
dc.identifier000331420600005
dc.identifier.citationVoelter , C J & Call , J 2014 , ' Younger apes and human children plan their moves in a maze task ' , Cognition , vol. 130 , no. 2 , pp. 186-203 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.007en
dc.identifier.issn0010-0277
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8597-8336/work/37477800
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8634
dc.descriptionChristoph Völter was supported by a scholarship of the German National Academic Foundation.en
dc.description.abstractPlanning defined as the predetermination of a sequence of actions towards some goal is crucial for complex problem solving. To shed light on the evolution of executive functions, we investigated the ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins of planning. Therefore, we presented all four great apes species (N = 12) as well as 4- and 5-year-old human preschoolers (N = 24) with a vertical maze task. To gain a reward placed on the uppermost level of the maze, subjects had to move the reward to the bottom through open gaps situated at each level of the maze. In total, there were ten gaps located over three of the maze's levels, and free passage through these gaps could be flexibly blocked using multiple traps. Due to the decision tree design of the maze, the subjects had to plan their actions depending on the trap configuration up to two steps ahead to successfully retrieve the reward. We found that (1) our measure of planning was negatively correlated with age in nonhuman apes, (2) younger apes as well as 5-year-old children planned their moves up to two steps ahead whereas 4-year-olds were limited to plan one step ahead, and (3) similar performance but different underlying limitations between apes and children. Namely, while all species of nonhuman apes were limited by a lack of motor control, human children exhibited a shortage in shifting their attention across a sequence of subgoals. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent591661
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCognitionen
dc.subjectPrimatesen
dc.subjectPlanningen
dc.subjectProblem solvingen
dc.subjectExecutive functionsen
dc.subjectAgingen
dc.subjectInhibitory controlen
dc.subjectChimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)en
dc.subjectShort-term-memoryen
dc.subjectGreat Apesen
dc.subjectPrefrontal cortexen
dc.subjectFrontal-lobeen
dc.subjectCognitive-developmenten
dc.subjectCapuchin monkeysen
dc.subjectPongo-Pygmaeusen
dc.subjectWorking-memoryen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleYounger apes and human children plan their moves in a maze tasken
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.007
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record