Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Kelsey Jackson
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-07T13:00:06Z
dc.date.available2016-04-07T13:00:06Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationWilliams , K J 2014 , ' Canon before Canon, Literature before Literature: Thomas Pope Blount and the Scope of Early Modern Learning ' , Huntington Library Quarterly , vol. 77 , no. 2 , pp. 177-199 . https://doi.org/10.1525/hlq.2014.77.2.177en
dc.identifier.issn0018-7895
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 241731329
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 18c7beaa-69dc-414e-8bf3-b82b1c6e6932
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000338390900004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8573
dc.description.abstractSir Thomas Pope Blount (1649–1697), an English essayist and country gentleman, published two major literary biobibliographies, Censura celebriorum authorum (1690) and De re poetica (1694). In this essay, Kelsey Jackson Williams discusses the texts within the genre of historia literaria and contemporary understandings of literature. In doing so, he engages with current debates surrounding canon formation and the shifts in disciplinary boundaries that followed in the wake of the Battle of the Books. Early modern canons and definitions of “literature” differed radically from their modern equivalents, and a close reading of Blount’s work offers a window onto this forgotten literary landscape.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofHuntington Library Quarterlyen
dc.rights©2014 by Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published at https://dx.doi.org/10.1525/hlq.2014.77.2.177.en
dc.titleCanon before Canon, Literature before Literature: Thomas Pope Blount and the Scope of Early Modern Learningen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1525/hlq.2014.77.2.177
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/hlq.2014.77.2.177en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record