Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBramich, D. M.
dc.contributor.authorHorne, Keith Douglas
dc.contributor.authorAlsubai, K. A.
dc.contributor.authorBachelet, E.
dc.contributor.authorMislis, D.
dc.contributor.authorParley, N.
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-28T12:00:14Z
dc.date.available2016-03-28T12:00:14Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-21
dc.identifier.citationBramich , D M , Horne , K D , Alsubai , K A , Bachelet , E , Mislis , D & Parley , N 2016 , ' Difference image analysis : automatic kernel design using information criteria ' , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , vol. 457 , no. 1 , pp. 542-574 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2910en
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 241589050
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 99bbc7a7-02a9-4c67-84de-62c5ea967398
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:E4CD9EFF425B6ECE6B124BF481CD22DB
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84961584135
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000372599600040
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8503
dc.descriptionThis publication was made possible by NPRP grant # X-019-1-006 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation).en
dc.description.abstractWe present a selection of methods for automatically constructing an optimal kernel model for difference image analysis which require very few external parameters to control the kernel design. Each method consists of two components; namely, a kernel design algorithm to generate a set of candidate kernel models, and a model selection criterion to select the simplest kernel model from the candidate models that provides a sufficiently good fit to the target image. We restricted our attention to the case of solving for a spatially invariant convolution kernel composed of delta basis functions, and we considered 19 different kernel solution methods including six employing kernel regularization. We tested these kernel solution methods by performing a comprehensive set of image simulations and investigating how their performance in terms of model error, fit quality, and photometric accuracy depends on the properties of the reference and target images. We find that the irregular kernel design algorithm employing unregularized delta basis functions, combined with either the Akaike or Takeuchi information criterion, is the best kernel solution method in terms of photometric accuracy. Our results are validated by tests performed on two independent sets of real data. Finally, we provide some important recommendations for software implementations of difference image analysis.
dc.format.extent33
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyen
dc.rights© 2016 The Authors. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published at https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2910en
dc.subjectMethods: data analysisen
dc.subjectMethods: statisticalen
dc.subjectTechniques: image processingen
dc.subjectTechniques: photometricen
dc.subjectQB Astronomyen
dc.subjectQC Physicsen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccQBen
dc.subject.lccQCen
dc.titleDifference image analysis : automatic kernel design using information criteriaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorScience & Technology Facilities Councilen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Physics and Astronomyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2910
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumberST/M001296/1en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record