The Janus and the Janissary : reading into Camus' 'La chute' and Hamid's 'The reluctant fundamentalist'
MetadataShow full item record
Mohsin Hamid has acknowledged the influence of Camus's The Fall (1956) in his use of implied dialogue in The Reluctant Fundamentalist (2007). Although the works have other elements in common, I focus primarily on this and other formal features, including degrees of self-reflexivity and metanarrative, the representation of the past, and the use of pronouns. This leads to an analysis of the reception of The Fall and the manner in which critics have turned to paratextual material in their historico-political interpretations, a form of “reading into” which I suggest is prompted by the monologic, “terroristic” nature of the narrative. Hamid's Reluctant Fundamentalist, by contrast, has been interpreted predominantly in terms of post-9/11 geopolitical issues articulated within the diegesis: a “reading in” rather than “into.” To redress the critical balance, the article closes with a reading of Hamid's text that decenters such interpretations, focusing instead on the representation of books, global markets, and diegetic novelists, a “return of the author” in another guise.
Hutton , M A 2016 , ' The Janus and the Janissary : reading into Camus' 'La chute' and Hamid's 'The reluctant fundamentalist' ' Comparative Literature , vol 68 , no. 1 , pp. 59-74 . DOI: 10.1215/00104124-3462651
© 2016 by University of Oregon. This work is made available online with permission from the publisher. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00104124-3462651
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.