Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWatson, E. J.
dc.contributor.authorSwindles, G. T.
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Ian Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSavov, I. P.
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-23T12:30:17Z
dc.date.available2016-03-23T12:30:17Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-01
dc.identifier.citationWatson , E J , Swindles , G T , Lawson , I T & Savov , I P 2016 , ' Do peatlands or lakes provide the most comprehensive distal tephra records? ' , Quaternary Science Reviews , vol. 139 , pp. 110-128 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.03.011en
dc.identifier.issn0277-3791
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 241578034
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 62524153-d8e8-495f-813f-de56b9489a0b
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:E93B706CEC08EED6CCC447CA71E9F300
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84977126596
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000374606100009
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3547-2425/work/75996912
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8468
dc.descriptionThis research was undertaken while Elizabeth Watson held a NERC-funded Doctoral Training Grant (NE/K500847/1). GTS acknowledges support from the Dutch Foundation for the Conservation of Irish Bogs. IS and EJW thank CGS for generous support of the fieldwork in Sweden.en
dc.description.abstractDespite the widespread application of tephra studies for dating and correlation of stratigraphic sequences (‘tephrochronology’), questions remain over the reliability and replicability of tephra records from lake sediments and peats, particularly in sites >1000 km from source volcanoes. To address this, we examine the tephrostratigraphy of four pairs of lake and peatland sites in close proximity to one another (<10 km), and evaluate the extent to which the microscopic (crypto-) tephra records in lakes and peatlands differ. The peatlands typically record more cryptotephra layers than nearby lakes, but cryptotephra records from high-latitude peatlands can be incomplete, possibly due to tephra fallout onto snow and subsequent redistribution across the peatland surface by wind and during snowmelt. We find no evidence for chemical alteration of glass shards in peatland or lake environments over the time scale of this study (mid-to late- Holocene). Instead, the low number of basaltic cryptotephra layers identified in distal peatlands reflects the capture of only primary tephra-fall, whereas lakes concentrate tephra falling across their catchments which subsequently washes into the lake, adding to the primary tephra fallout received in the lake. A combination of records from both lakes and peatlands must be used to establish the most comprehensive and complete regional tephrostratigraphies. We also describe two previously unreported late Holocene cryptotephras and demonstrate, for the first time, that Holocene Icelandic ash clouds frequently reached Arctic Sweden.
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofQuaternary Science Reviewsen
dc.rights© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectTephrochronologyen
dc.subjectCryptotephraen
dc.subjectNorthern Europeen
dc.subjectHoloceneen
dc.subjectBasalten
dc.subjectG Geography (General)en
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccG1en
dc.titleDo peatlands or lakes provide the most comprehensive distal tephra records?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.03.011
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record