Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRapport, Nigel Julian
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-20T00:01:13Z
dc.date.available2016-03-20T00:01:13Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.identifier.citationRapport , N J 2015 , ' Anthropology through Levinas : knowing the uniqueness of ego and the mystery of otherness ' , Current Anthropology , vol. 56 , no. 2 , pp. 256-276 . https://doi.org/10.1086/680433en
dc.identifier.issn0011-3204
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 129086949
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: abb28481-e5e0-43ed-9fde-02da4b747db7
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84928230818
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000353415300005
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-2803-0212/work/90112034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/8440
dc.description.abstractAn anthropological commonplace since Evans-Pritchard has been that ethnographic subjects will have their rationality circumscribed by the discursive opportunities made available by a “culture.” Hence, social science comes to terms with the “internal” nature of judgements (Winch). Ultimately, the relativist nature of both Winch’s and Evans-Pritchard’s conclusion has its source in Wittgenstein’s philosophy. For Wittgenstein, “the limits of my language mean the limits of my world.” Moreover, “language” in this connection extends to the “textual” nature of behavior per se. There exists a determining habituation of embodiment and dwelling as well as of reasoning, believing, and talking. This article explores the nature of a pretextual or nontextual sphere that exists beyond conventional—“cultural”—languages. Wittgensteinian assumptions are set against those of Max Stirner and Emmanuel Levinas. While in many ways disparate, the writings of Stirner on the ego and of Levinas on the “other” both insist that knowledge can be derived—knowledge, indeed, of a fundamental, even absolute, nature—by way of a transcending of a taken-for-granted symbolic, conceptual, textual, and doctrinal language-world. What is key is the attention one pays to corporeality: to the “flesh and mind” of the self (Stirner), to the “body and face” of the other (Levinas). The article is theoretical and epistemological in register. An ethnographic afterword points in the direction of how the argument might be grounded in representations of fieldwork encounters.
dc.format.extent20
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Anthropologyen
dc.rights© 2015 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's open access policy. The final version can also be found via the publisher's website: http://www.jstor.org/stable/full/10.1086/680433en
dc.subjectGN Anthropologyen
dc.subject.lccGNen
dc.titleAnthropology through Levinas : knowing the uniqueness of ego and the mystery of othernessen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Social Anthropologyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1086/680433
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-03-20


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record