Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Margaret
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-18T14:30:15Z
dc.date.available2016-03-18T14:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.identifier.citationConnolly , M 2016 , ' Evidence for the continued use of medieval medical prescriptions in the sixteenth century : a fifteenth-century remedy book and its later owner ' , Medical History , vol. 60 , no. 2 , pp. 133-154 . https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2016.1en
dc.identifier.issn0025-7273
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 232768777
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ce024ec3-e154-40db-9f7e-a512d9890a3b
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84960951098
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-5010-9782/work/40449122
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000373017400001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/8437
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant no. 104798/Z/14/Z).en
dc.description.abstractThis article examines a fifteenth-century remedy book, Oxford, Bodleian Library, Rawlinson c. 299, and describes its collection of 314 medieval medical prescriptions. The recipes are organised broadly from head to toe, and often several remedies are offered for the same complaint. Some individual recipes are transcribed with modern English translations. The few non-recipe texts are also noted. The difference between a remedy book and a leechbook is explained, and this manuscript is situated in relation to other known examples of late medieval medical anthologies. The particular feature that distinguishes Oxford, Bodleian Library, Rawlinson c. 299 from other similar volumes is the evidence that it continued to be used during the sixteenth century. This usage was of two kinds. Firstly, the London lawyer who owned it not only inscribed his name but annotated the original recipe collection in various ways, providing finding-aids that made it much more user-friendly. Secondly, he, and other members of his family, added another 43 recipes to the original collection (some examples of these are also transcribed). These two layers of readerly engagement with the manuscript are interrogated in detail in order to reveal what ailments may have troubled this family most, and to judge how much faith they placed in the old remedies contained in this old book. It is argued that the knowledge preserved in medieval books enjoyed a longevity that extended beyond the period of the manuscript book, and that manuscripts were read and valued long after the advent of printing.
dc.format.extent22
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Historyen
dc.rights© The Author 2016. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectRemedy booken
dc.subjectMedieval recipesen
dc.subjectBodley Rawlinson c. 299en
dc.subjectThomas Robertsen
dc.subjectPlagueen
dc.subjectPhlegmen
dc.subjectCharmsen
dc.subjectManuscriptsen
dc.subjectD111 Medieval Historyen
dc.subjectPE Englishen
dc.subjectR Medicineen
dc.subject.lccD111en
dc.subject.lccPEen
dc.subject.lccRen
dc.titleEvidence for the continued use of medieval medical prescriptions in the sixteenth century : a fifteenth-century remedy book and its later owneren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Englishen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Institute of Mediaeval Studiesen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2016.1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/repo_A10Lxs1n/GtJKgen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4847415en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record