Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorKano, Fumihiro
dc.contributor.authorCall, Josep
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T17:10:04Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T17:10:04Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier141911987
dc.identifiera13f32d4-227b-4047-a732-2a36671e2959
dc.identifier000336458600018
dc.identifier84898624418
dc.identifier.citationKano , F & Call , J 2014 , ' Cross-species variation in gaze following and conspecific preference among great apes, human infants and adults ' , Animal Behaviour , vol. 91 , pp. 137-150 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.03.011en
dc.identifier.issn0003-3472
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8597-8336/work/37478051
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8392
dc.description.abstractAlthough previous studies have shown that many species follow gaze, few have directly compared closely related species, and thus its cross-species variation remains largely unclear. In this study, we compared three great ape species (bonobos, Pan paniscus, chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, orang-utans, Pongo abelii) and humans (12-month-olds and adults) in their gaze-following responses to the videos of conspecific and allospecific models. In the video, the model turned his head repeatedly to one of two identical objects. We used a noninvasive eye-tracking technique to measure participants' eye movements, and used both conspecific and allospecific models as stimuli to examine their potential preference in following conspecific rather than allospecific gaze. Experiment 1 presented to great apes the videos of conspecific and human models. We found that all species followed the conspecific gaze. Chimpanzees did not follow the human gaze, whereas bonobos did. Bonobos reacted overall more sensitively than chimpanzees to both conspecific and human gaze. Experiment 2 presented to human infants and adults the videos of human, chimpanzee and orang-utan models. Both infants and adults followed the human gaze. Unlike adults, infants did not follow the ape gaze. Experiment 3 presented to great apes the videos of allospecific ape models. Consistent with experiment 1, chimpanzees did not follow the allospecific ape gaze, whereas bonobos and orang-utans did. Importantly, preferential following of conspecific gaze by chimpanzees (experiment 1) and human infants (experiment 2) was mainly explained by their prolonged viewing of the conspecific face and thus seems to reflect their motivation to attend selectively to the conspecific models. Taken together, we conclude that gaze following is modulated by both subject species and model species in great apes and humans, presumably a reflection of the subjects' intrinsic sensitivity to gaze and also their selective interest in particular models. (C) 2014 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.format.extent14
dc.format.extent1047255
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Behaviouren
dc.subjectConspecific modelen
dc.subjectGaze followingen
dc.subjectGreat apeen
dc.subjectHuman infanten
dc.subjectSpecies differenceen
dc.subjectJoint visual-attentionen
dc.subjectMonkeys Cebus-Apellaen
dc.subjectPan-troglodytesen
dc.subjectDifferential sensitivityen
dc.subjectMacaca-Mulattaen
dc.subjectSocial cuesen
dc.subjectChimpanzeesen
dc.subjectEyeen
dc.subjectDirectionen
dc.subjectOrangutansen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleCross-species variation in gaze following and conspecific preference among great apes, human infants and adultsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.03.011
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347214001286#appd001en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record