Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorHolmes, Stephen R.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Darren W.
dc.coverage.spatial272en
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-10T15:02:51Z
dc.date.available2009-12-10T15:02:51Z
dc.date.issued2009-06-25
dc.identifieruk.bl.ethos.552220
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/829
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses eighteenth-century English-speaking evangelicals' understandings of church history, through the lens of published attempts to represent preceding Christian centuries panoramically or comprehensively. Sources entail several short reflections on history emerging in the early years of the transatlantic Revival (1730s-1740s) and subsequent, more substantial efforts by evangelical leaders John Gillies, Jonathan Edwards, John Wesley, Joseph and Isaac Milner, and Thomas Haweis. Little scholarly analysis exists on these sources, aside from the renaissance of interest in recent decades in Edwards. This is surprising, considering the acknowledged prominence of history-writing in the eighteenth century and the influence attributed, then and now, to the works of authors such as Gibbon, Hume, and Robertson. The aim is, first, to elucidate each of the above evangelicals' interpretations of the Christian past, both in overview and according to what they said on a roster of particular historical events, people and movements, and then to consider shared and divergent aspects. These aspects range from points of detail to paradigmatic theological convictions. Secondarily, evangelical church histories are analyzed in relation to earlier Protestant as well as eighteenth-century 'enlightened' historiography, in part through attention to evangelical authors' explicit engagement with these currents. This contextualization assists in determining the unique qualities of evangelical interpretations. Is there, then, evidence of a characteristically 'evangelical' perspective on church history? An examination of this neglected area illumines patterns and particulars of evangelicals' historical thought, and these in turn communicate the self-perceptions and the defining features of evangelicalism itself. Findings support the primary contention that evangelical leaders made use of a dynamic pattern of revival and declension as a means of accounting for the full history of Christianity. Beyond displaying the central place of 'revival' for evangelicals, these church histories demonstrate evangelicalism‘s complex relationship—involving both receptivity and critique—with Protestant and Enlightenment currents of historical inquiry.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subjectEvangelicalism (18th-century)en
dc.subjectEvangelical historiographyen
dc.subjectChurch historiographyen
dc.subjectProtestant historiographyen
dc.subjectEnlightenment historiographyen
dc.subjectRevivalen
dc.subjectWilliam Cooperen
dc.subjectThomas Prince Sr.en
dc.subjectJonathan Edwardsen
dc.subjectHistory of the work of Redemptionen
dc.subjectJohn Gilliesen
dc.subjectHistorical collectionsen
dc.subjectJohn Wesleyen
dc.subjectConcise ecclesiastical historyen
dc.subjectJoseph Milneren
dc.subjectHistory of the Church of Christen
dc.subjectIsaac Milneren
dc.subjectThomas Haweisen
dc.subjectImpartial and succinct historyen
dc.subject.lccBR138.S65
dc.subject.lcshChurch history--Historiography--18th centuryen
dc.subject.lcshEvangelicalism--England--History--18th centuryen
dc.subject.lcshEvangelicalism--United States--History--18th centuryen
dc.titleReviving the past : eighteenth-century evangelical interpretations of church historyen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen


The following license files are associated with this item:

  • Creative Commons

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's license for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported