Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMarsden, Sarah Victoria
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-20T00:12:17Z
dc.date.available2016-01-20T00:12:17Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier164171001
dc.identifier2d06de81-a8e1-4d20-8047-0a1fea6770f6
dc.identifier84949627302
dc.identifier000214065700003
dc.identifier.citationMarsden , S V 2015 , ' Conceptualising ‘success’ with those convicted of terrorism offences : aims, methods, and barriers to reintegration ' , Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression , vol. Early view . https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2014.1001421en
dc.identifier.issn1943-4472
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4763-5068/work/80257712
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/8043
dc.description.abstractDespite an increasing need to understand the aims of work with ex-prisoners convicted of terrorism offences, the knowledge base remains underdeveloped. Notwithstanding this limited theoretical and empirical foundation, practitioners in probation are increasingly faced with trying to successfully resettle these exprisoners. In the south of England, the organisation tasked with this work is London Probation Trust’s Central Extremism Unit (CEU). Based on interviews and observational research with practitioners, this article sets out a framework for interpreting this work’s aims from a practitioner perspective. Alongside describing the 13 primary aims of successful resettlement, the research sets out what success would ‘look like’, as well as considering some of the challenges in interpreting and promoting positive outcomes. The CEU’s model reflects a multimodal approach, speaking to both criminogenic needs, and the primary themes of desistance. Within this, practitioners try to encourage the probationers to take control of their own life and develop an agentic approach to their present and future. It is in this way that successful resettlement is conceptualised by practitioners working in this field. The implications of these findings for current debates over the appropriate focus of work on countering violent extremism and returnees from overseas conflict are also discussed.
dc.format.extent488349
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggressionen
dc.subjectTerrorismen
dc.subjectDesistanceen
dc.subjectProbationen
dc.subject'De-radicalisation'en
dc.subjectCountering violent extremismen
dc.subjectReturning ‘foreign fighters’en
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleConceptualising ‘success’ with those convicted of terrorism offences : aims, methods, and barriers to reintegrationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. The Handa Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violenceen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19434472.2014.1001421
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2016-01-20


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record