MetadataShow full item record
NB: This is my presidential address for the conference and I was the lead editor for the volume, which should be submitted as a single item, including this essay and the introduction. This essay focuses on the figure of John the Baptist in prison and the question he sent his disciples to ask Christ: was he ‘the one who is to come’ (Matthew 11: 2–3). Having observed how the Fathers strove to distance John from the perils of doubt in their readings of this passage, it traces the way their arguments were picked up by twelfth and thirteenth-century biblical exegetes and then by authors of anti-heretical dispute texts in urban Italy, where the Baptist was a popular patron saint. So as to give force to their own counter-arguments, learned polemicists, clerical and lay, made much of heretics’ hostility to John, powerfully ventriloquizing a doubting, sceptical standpoint. One counter-argument was to assign any doubts to John’s disciples, for whose benefit he therefore sent to ask for confirmation of the means of Christ’s return, neatly moving doubt from questions of faith to epistemology. Such ideas may have seeped beyond the bounds of a university trained elite, as is perhaps visible in a fourteenth-century fresco representing John in prison engaging with anxious disciples. But place, audience and genre determined where doubt was energetically debated and where it was more usually avoided, as in sermons for the laity on the feast of a popular saint.
Andrews , F 2016 , Doubting John? in F Andrews , C Methuen & A Spicer (eds) , Doubting Christianity/The Church and Doubt . Studies in Church History , vol. 52 , Cambridge University Press , pp. 17-48 . DOI: 10.1017/stc.2015.2
Doubting Christianity/The Church and Doubt
© Ecclesiastical History Society 2016. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. This manuscript may only be used for personal research and may not be further distributed. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/stc.2015.2
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.