Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWeber, Z.
dc.contributor.authorCotnoir, A.J.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-01T00:11:48Z
dc.date.available2015-12-01T00:11:48Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifier.citationWeber , Z & Cotnoir , A J 2014 , ' Inconsistent boundaries ' , Synthese , vol. In Press . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0614-zen
dc.identifier.issn0039-7857
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 161262922
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 63e5e92e-5e83-46a0-897c-05dab5429e16
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84939960599
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4528-7570/work/65702591
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000354385300002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/7873
dc.descriptionResearch on this paper was supported by a grant from the Marsden Fund, Royal Society of New Zealand.en
dc.description.abstractMereotopology is a theory of connected parts. The existence of boundaries, as parts of everyday objects, is basic to any such theory; but in classical mereotopology, there is a problem: if boundaries exist, then either distinct entities cannot be in contact, or else space is not topologically connected (Varzi in Noûs 31:26–58, 1997). In this paper we urge that this problem can be met with a paraconsistent mereotopology, and sketch the details of one such approach. The resulting theory focuses attention on the role of empty parts, in delivering a balanced and bounded metaphysics of naive space.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSyntheseen
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0614-zen
dc.subjectMereologyen
dc.subjectParaconsistent logicen
dc.subjectSpatial representationen
dc.subjectBC Logicen
dc.subject.lccBCen
dc.titleInconsistent boundariesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. University of St Andrewsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0614-z
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2015-12-01


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record