Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorClay, Susanna Elizabeth Valerie
dc.contributor.authorArchbold, Jahmaira
dc.contributor.authorZuberbuehler, Klaus
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-25T09:10:05Z
dc.date.available2015-09-25T09:10:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-04
dc.identifier.citationClay , S E V , Archbold , J & Zuberbuehler , K 2015 , ' Functional flexibility in wild bonobo vocal behaviour ' , PeerJ . https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1124en
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 219297087
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c5eab09e-68eb-4efd-a8e6-60acfffbb735
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84940379207
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000360844000006
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8378-088X/work/64360758
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/7539
dc.descriptionThis research was financially supported by the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, the National Geographic Society: Committee for Research and Exploration Grant, the British Academy Small Research Grant, the European Union Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement 283871 and private donors associated with the British Academy and the Leakey Foundation.en
dc.description.abstractA shared principle in the evolution of language and the development of speech is the emergence of functional flexibility, the capacity of vocal signals to express a range of emotional states independently of context and biological function. Functional flexibility has recently been demonstrated in the vocalisations of pre-linguistic human infants, which has been contrasted to the functionally fixed vocal behaviour of non-human primates. Here, we revisited the presumed chasm in functional flexibility between human and non-human primate vocal behaviour, with a study on our closest living primate relatives, the bonobo (Pan paniscus). We found that wild bonobos use a specific call type (the “peep”) across a range of contexts that cover the full valence range (positive-neutral-negative) in much of their daily activities, including feeding, travel, rest, aggression, alarm, nesting and grooming. Peeps were produced in functionally flexible ways in some contexts, but not others. Crucially, calls did not vary acoustically between neutral and positive contexts, suggesting that recipients take pragmatic information into account to make inferences about call meaning. In comparison, peeps during negative contexts were acoustically distinct. Our data suggest that the capacity for functional flexibility has evolutionary roots that predate the evolution of human speech. We interpret this evidence as an example of an evolutionary early transition away from fixed vocal signalling towards functional flexibility.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPeerJen
dc.rights© 2015 Clay et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.en
dc.subjectVocal developmenten
dc.subjectSpeech evolutionen
dc.subjectGreat apeen
dc.subjectPre-linguistic infanten
dc.subjectEmotion valenceen
dc.subjectVocal flexibilityen
dc.subjectPrimateen
dc.subjectLanguage evolutionen
dc.subjectProtophoneen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subjectGN Anthropologyen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.subject.lccGNen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.titleFunctional flexibility in wild bonobo vocal behaviouren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1124
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://peerj.com/articles/1124/#supplemental-informationen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record