Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFaria, Goncalo
dc.contributor.authorVarela, Susana
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Andy
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-21T08:40:04Z
dc.date.available2015-08-21T08:40:04Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.identifier.citationFaria , G , Varela , S & Gardner , A 2015 , ' Sex-biased dispersal, kin selection and the evolution of sexual conflict. ' Journal of Evolutionary Biology , vol. 28 , no. 10 , pp. 1901-1910 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12697en
dc.identifier.issn1010-061X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 201383247
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: dec534ed-eaf7-450b-80f7-a582316cacdb
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84943657938
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-1511-8680/work/30765801
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/7292
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by Portuguese funds from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through cE3c Unit FCT funding UID/BIA/00329/2013 and through SAMV Post-Doctoral Research Grant (SFRH/BPD/66042/2009), and by a Natural Environment Research Council Independent Research Fellowship (AG, Grant Number NE/K009524/1).en
dc.description.abstractThere is growing interest in resolving the curious disconnect between the fields of kin selection and sexual selection. Rankin’s (2011, J Evol Biol 24, 71-81) theoretical study of the impact of kin selection on the evolution of sexual conflict in viscous populations has been particularly valuable in stimulating empirical research in this area. An important goal of that study was to understand the impact of sex-specific rates of dispersal upon the coevolution of male-harm and female-resistance behaviours. But the fitness functions derived in Rankin’s study do not flow from his model’s assumptions and, in particular, are not consistent with sex-biased dispersal. Here, we develop new fitness functions that do logically flow from the model’s assumptions, to determine the impact of sex-specific patterns of dispersal on the evolution of sexual conflict. Whilst Rankin’s study suggested that increasing male dispersal always promotes the evolution of male harm and that increasing female dispersal always inhibits the evolution of male harm, we find that the opposite can also be true, depending upon parameter values.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.rights© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectCoevolutionen
dc.subjectHarmingen
dc.subjectInclusive fitnessen
dc.subjectMigrationen
dc.subjectPhilopatryen
dc.subjectPopulation viscosityen
dc.subjectRelatednessen
dc.subjectResistanceen
dc.subjectSelfishnessen
dc.subjectSexual selectionen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleSex-biased dispersal, kin selection and the evolution of sexual conflict.en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12697
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jeb.12697/suppinfo


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record