It doesn't compare to being there : in-situ vs. remote exploration of museum collections
MetadataShow full item record
The digitization of museum collections has the potential not only to make them accessible remotely but also to augment their in-situ exploration at the gallery. We are interested in how mobile visual interfaces to museum collections can enhance explorations and experiences of the collection insitu, and how these in-situ explorations compare to remote browsing of collections, e.g., through web-based interfaces. We discuss findings from a study where potential visitors explored a museum collection using a tablet-based visualization remotely, at first, and then as part of their museum visit. Our findings show that the entry points to the collection differ in the two different contexts: while overview visualizations linked with individual artifacts triggered curiosity and promoted exploration in the remote setting, it was the individual (physical) artifacts that drove explorations of the mobile visualization in-situ. While remote explorations of the visualization can be characterized as highly open-ended, in-situ, people approached the interface in a more targeted way. These findings suggest an item-centric approach to the design of mobile visualizations that bridges the physical and digital information space to assist in-situ explorations of museums collections.
Rogers , K , Hinrichs , U & Quigley , A 2014 , ' It doesn't compare to being there : in-situ vs. remote exploration of museum collections ' Paper presented at The Search Is Over! Exploring Cultural Collections with Visualization , London , United Kingdom , 11/09/14 - 12/09/14 , .workshop
Non peer reviewed
Copyright is with the authors
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.