Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWest, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Roberta
dc.contributor.authorGardner, Andy
dc.contributor.authorKiers, Erica
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-10T15:40:01Z
dc.date.available2015-07-10T15:40:01Z
dc.date.issued2015-08
dc.identifier.citationWest , S , Fisher , R , Gardner , A & Kiers , E 2015 , ' The major evolutionary transitions in individuality ' , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , vol. 112 , no. 33 , pp. 10112-10119 . https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421402112en
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 176889629
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: ce42ac27-1518-4df7-b455-a656ecee1950
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84938901279
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000359738300031
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/6969
dc.descriptionWe thank the Calleva Research Centre, Magdalen College, the European Research Council, the Natural Environment Research Council, and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research for funding.en
dc.description.abstractThe evolution of life on earth has been driven by a small number of major evolutionary transitions. These have been characterized by individuals that could previously replicate independently, cooperating to form a new, more complex life form. For example, archaea and eubacteria formed eukaryotic cells, and cells formed multicellular organisms. But not all cooperative groups are on route to major transitions. How can we explain why major evolutionary transitions have or haven't taken place on different branches of the tree of life? We break down major transitions into two steps, the formation of a cooperative group and the transformation of that group into an integrated entity. We show how these steps require cooperation, division of labour, communication, mutual dependence and negligible within group conflict. We find that certain ecological conditions and the ways in which groups form have played recurrent roles in driving multiple transitions. In contrast, we find that other factors have played relatively minor roles at many key points, such as within-group kin discrimination and mechanisms to actively repress competition. More generally, by identifying the small number of factors that have driven major transitions, we provide a simpler and more unified description of how life on earth has evolved.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaen
dc.rightsCopyright The Authors 2015. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published in PNAS on 11 May 2015. The final publication is available at http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/05/08/1421402112.abstract?tab=author-infoen
dc.subjectCooperationen
dc.subjectAltriusmen
dc.subjectSignallingen
dc.subjectDivision of labouren
dc.subjectConflicten
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleThe major evolutionary transitions in individualityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorNERCen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421402112
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/K009524/1en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record