Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSmet, Ann Farai
dc.contributor.authorByrne, Richard William
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-08T16:10:07Z
dc.date.available2015-07-08T16:10:07Z
dc.date.issued2014-11
dc.identifier.citationSmet , A F & Byrne , R W 2014 , ' Interpretation of human pointing by African elephants : generalisation and rationality ' , Animal Cognition , vol. 17 , no. 6 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0772-xen
dc.identifier.issn1435-9448
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 126422645
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 5e8b1503-2bda-494d-94f0-fffb70a983cf
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84919429329
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-9862-9373/work/60630552
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000343884800012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/6937
dc.descriptionThis research was carried out with funding from a departmental studentship from the School of Psychology and Neuroscience of the University of St Andrews, awarded to AFS.en
dc.description.abstractFactors influencing the abilities of different animals to use cooperative social cues from humans are still unclear, in spite of long-standing interest in the topic. One of the few species that have been found successful at using human pointing is the African elephant (Loxodonta africana); despite few opportunities for learning about pointing, elephants follow a pointing gesture in an object-choice task, even when the pointing signal and experimenter’s body position are in conflict, and when the gesture itself is visually subtle. Here, we show that the success of captive African elephants at using human pointing is not restricted to situations where the pointing signal is sustained until the time of choice: elephants followed human pointing even when the pointing gesture was withdrawn before they had responded to it. Furthermore, elephants rapidly generalised their response to a type of social cue they were unlikely to have seen before: pointing with the foot. However, unlike young children, they showed no sign of evaluating the ‘rationality’ of this novel pointing gesture according to its visual context: that is, whether the experimenter’s hands were occupied or not.
dc.format.extent10
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Cognitionen
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0772-xen
dc.subjectPointingen
dc.subjectSocial cuesen
dc.subjectObject-choiceen
dc.subjectRationalityen
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleInterpretation of human pointing by African elephants : generalisation and rationalityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscienceen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0772-x
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10071-014-0772-x/MediaObjects/10071_2014_772_MOESM1_ESM.docxen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10071-014-0772-x/MediaObjects/10071_2014_772_MOESM2_ESM.mpgen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10071-014-0772-x/MediaObjects/10071_2014_772_MOESM3_ESM.mpgen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10071-014-0772-x/MediaObjects/10071_2014_772_MOESM4_ESM.mpgen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10071-014-0772-x/MediaObjects/10071_2014_772_MOESM5_ESM.mpgen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record