Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Tom
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Kim
dc.contributor.authorMcLoughlin, Pauline Joy
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-24T11:31:02Z
dc.date.available2015-04-24T11:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-23
dc.identifier.citationMoore , T , McKee , K & McLoughlin , P J 2015 , ' Online focus groups and qualitative research in the social sciences : their merits and limitations in a study of housing and youth ' , People, Place and Policy , vol. 9 , no. 1 , pp. 17-28 . https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0009.0001.0002en
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 154931908
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 65a52f65-1445-47a6-8f41-c12ef0840624
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3611-569X/work/32192391
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/6573
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers the use of online focus groups as a method for conducting qualitative research in geography. Researchers have increasingly utilised online focus groups involving live, synchronous chat room interactions. However, to date there has been little insight and a lack of discussion as to the applicability of online focus groups in geography and the wider social sciences. Reflecting on a study of young people’s housing opportunities and financial welfare in the UK, this paper considers the advantages and limitations of online qualitative methods. We argue that online methods offer significant advantages, especially in longer-term studies crossing time and space, but that their design and implementation raises methodological challenges, with implications for the depth and insight of the knowledge produced. Their use for research in geography therefore requires reflexivity and adjustment, including attention to the positionality of the researcher, the nature and level of participant involvement, and adjustment to the loss of non-verbal cues and interactions found in conventional qualitative research. This paper advances knowledge on the opportunities and challenges to online methodologies, and highlights how creative use of web-based technology can support geographers conducting qualitative research.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPeople, Place and Policyen
dc.rights© 2015 The Author. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's copyright policy.en
dc.subjectHousingen
dc.subjectYoung peopleen
dc.subjectOnline researchen
dc.subjectTwitteren
dc.subjectQualitative methodsen
dc.subjectFocus Groupsen
dc.subjectGF Human ecology. Anthropogeographyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccGFen
dc.titleOnline focus groups and qualitative research in the social sciences : their merits and limitations in a study of housing and youthen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0009.0001.0002
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://wealthgap.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/work-streams/ws4/en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record