Partner (dis)agreement on moving desires and the subsequent moving behaviour of couples
Abstract
Most studies of residential mobility decision-making focus on the housing and neighbourhood satisfaction and pre-move thoughts of individuals. This implicitly assumes that individual evaluations represent the wider household unit. However, if partners in a couple do not share evaluations of dwelling or neighbourhood quality or do not agree on whether moving is (un)desirable, ignoring these disagreements will lead to an inaccurate assessment of the strength of the links between moving desires and actual moves. Although overlooked in studies of residential mobility, partner disagreement plays an important role in the literature on family migration. This study is, therefore, one of the first to investigate disagreements in moving desires between partners and the subsequent consequences of such disagreements for moving behaviour. Drawing on British Household Panel Survey data and concepts from family migration studies, we find that disagreement about the desirability of moving is most likely where partners do not share perceptions of housing stress. Panel logistic regression models show that the moving desires of both partners interact to affect the moving behaviour of couples. Only 7.6% of couples move if only the man desires to move, whereas 20.1% of shared moving desires lead to a subsequent move.
Citation
Coulter , R , van Ham , M & Feijten , P 2012 , ' Partner (dis)agreement on moving desires and the subsequent moving behaviour of couples ' , Population, Space and Place , vol. 18 , no. 1 , pp. 16-30 . https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.700
Publication
Population, Space and Place
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1544-8444Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is the accepted version of the following article: Coulter, R., van Ham, M. and Feijten, P. (2012), Partner (dis)agreement on moving desires and the subsequent moving behaviour of couples. Popul. Space Place, 18: 16–30, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp.700
Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.