Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorShaw, Philip
dc.contributor.authorCresswell, Will
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-31T23:01:49Z
dc.date.available2015-03-31T23:01:49Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-01
dc.identifier.citationShaw , P & Cresswell , W 2014 , ' Latitudinal variation in day length and working day length has a confounding effect when comparing nest attentiveness in tropical and temperate species ' , Journal of Ornithology , vol. 155 , no. 2 , pp. 481-489 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-1029-1en
dc.identifier.issn2193-7192
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 77197527
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 6b223cd3-a459-41d2-a94a-03ee44436731
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84897371820
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4684-7624/work/60426958
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000337792000016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/6410
dc.descriptionWe gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the British Ornithologists’ Union and the African Bird Club.en
dc.description.abstractDuring incubation, tropical passerines have been shown to have lower levels of nest attentiveness than their counterparts at north temperate latitudes, spending a higher percentage of daylight time off the nest. This difference has been interpreted as evidence of parental restraint; tropical birds allocate more time to daily self-maintenance, perhaps preserving their higher annual survival rates and future breeding potential. But such comparisons are susceptible to the confounding effects of day length variation, because a given amount of time spent off the nest will account for a greater percentage of daylight time near to the equator than at high latitudes during spring and summer. Based on a pattern of increasing day length between 0° and 70°N, we show that the impact of this bias is likely to be small where sites are separated by less than 30°–40° of latitude, but should increase substantially both with latitudinal span and distance from the equator. To illustrate this effect, we compared nest attentiveness in two congeners breeding at 1°S and 52°N. During incubation, Stripe-breasted Tits Parus fasciiventer in Uganda had a shorter working day (time from emerging to retiring) than north temperate Great Tits P. major, and spent a higher percentage of daylight time off the nest (32 %) than Great Tits in the UK (24 %). However, this difference was almost wholly explained by the latitudinal difference in day length; the amount of time spent off the nest differed by just 10 min day−1 (<1 % of the 24-h cycle). We show that this effect may be moderated by the change in working day length, which increased less rapidly (in relation to latitude) than day length. Although these effects can thus confound latitudinal comparisons of nest attentiveness, accentuating a pattern predicted by life-history theory, they are avoidable if attentiveness is expressed as the percentage of time or the number of minutes spent incubating per 24 h.
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ornithologyen
dc.rights© 2013. Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. Published by Springer. The final publication is available at Springer via http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-1029-1en
dc.subjectNest attentivenessen
dc.subjectLatitudinal variationen
dc.subjectDay lengthen
dc.subjectWorking dayen
dc.subjectStripe-breasted Titen
dc.subjectParus fasciiventeren
dc.subjectGreat Titen
dc.subjectParus majoren
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleLatitudinal variation in day length and working day length has a confounding effect when comparing nest attentiveness in tropical and temperate speciesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-1029-1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2015-04-01


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record