Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRexstad, Eric
dc.coverage.spatial12 p.en
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-12T16:31:00Z
dc.date.available2009-01-12T16:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationCREEM technical report ; 2007-01en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/628
dc.descriptionPreviously in the University eprints HAIRST pilot service at http://eprints.st-andrews.ac.uk/archive/00000445/en
dc.description.abstractAllocation of sampling effort in the context of distance sampling is considered. Specifically, allocation of effort in proportion to portions of the survey region that likely contain high concentrations of animals are explored. The probability of a portion of the survey region being included in the sample is proportional to the estimated number of animals in that portion. These estimated numbers of animals may be derived from a density surface model. This results in unequal coverage probability, and a Horvitz- Thompson like estimator can be used to estimate population abundance. The properties of this estimator is explored here via simulation. The benefits, measured in terms of increased precision over traditional equal coverage probability estimators, are meagre, and largely manifested when the underlying population distribution is a smooth gradient.en
dc.format.extent383480 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCREEM, University of St Andrewsen
dc.subjectDensity surface modelen
dc.subjectestimator efficiencyen
dc.subjectHorvitz-Thompson estimatoren
dc.subjectprobability proportional to size (pps) estimatorsen
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.subject.lccQHen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.titleNon-uniform coverage estimators for distance sampling.en
dc.typeReporten
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.publicationstatusNot publisheden
dc.statusNon peer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record