Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorVan Ham, M.
dc.contributor.authorManley, D.
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-19T15:31:01Z
dc.date.available2015-03-19T15:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.identifier.citationVan Ham , M & Manley , D 2015 , ' Occupational mobility and living in deprived neighbourhoods : housing tenure differences in ‘neighbourhood effects’ ' , Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy , vol. 8 , no. 4 , pp. 309-324 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-014-9126-yen
dc.identifier.issn1874-463X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 175335963
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 7bf8e464-a59e-4ee5-9b7d-9ba1bec148b0
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84947484528
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000365260900001
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2106-0702/work/64697575
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/6268
dc.descriptionThis research was funded by the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement n. 615159 (ERC Consolidator Grant DEPRIVEDHOODS, Socio-spatial inequality, deprived neighbourhoods, and neighbourhood effects). The authors also acknowledge the Marie Curie programme under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / Career Integration Grant n. PCIG10-GA-2011-303728 (CIG Grant NBHCHOICE, Neighbourhood choice, neighbourhood sorting, and neighbourhood effects).en
dc.description.abstractThe literature on neighbourhood effects suggests that the lack of social mobility of some groups has a spatial dimension. It is thought that those living in the most deprived neighbourhoods are the least likely to achieve upward mobility because of a range of negative neighbourhood effects. Most studies investigating such effects only identify correlations between individual outcomes and their residential environment and do not take into account that selection into neighbourhoods is a non-random mechanism. This paper investigates occupational mobility between 1991 and 2001 for those who were employed in Scotland in 1991 by using unique longitudinal data from Scottish Longitudinal Study (SLS). We add to the existing literature by investigating neighbourhood effects on occupational mobility separately for social renters, private renters and home owners. We find that ‘neighbourhood effects’ are strongest for home owners, which is an unexpected finding. We argue that the correlation between characteristics of the residential environment and occupational mobility can at least partially be explained by selection effects: homeowners with the least resources, who are least likely to experience upward mobility, are also most likely to sort into the most deprived neighbourhoods. Social housing tenants experience less selective sorting across neighbourhoods as other than market forces are responsible for the neighbourhood sorting mechanism.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Spatial Analysis and Policyen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2014. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.en
dc.subjectNeighbourhood effectsen
dc.subjectOccupational mobilityen
dc.subjectDeprivationen
dc.subjectSelective mobilityen
dc.subjectLongitudinal dataen
dc.subjectGF Human ecology. Anthropogeographyen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subject.lccGFen
dc.titleOccupational mobility and living in deprived neighbourhoods : housing tenure differences in ‘neighbourhood effects’en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-014-9126-y
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record