Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorElliott, Mark
dc.contributor.authorOndrey, Hauna T.
dc.coverage.spatialviii, 225en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-19T14:02:51Z
dc.date.available2015-03-19T14:02:51Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/6267
dc.description.abstractMy thesis offers a comparison of the Minor Prophets commentaries of Theodore of Mopsuestia and Cyril of Alexandria, isolating the role each assigns (1) the Twelve Prophets in their ministry to Old Testament Israel and (2) the texts of the Twelve as Christian scripture. While the two produce radically different commentaries in terms of quantity and detail of christological interpretation, the source of their divergence cannot be reduced to Cyril’s admitting messianic prophecy whereas Theodore does not. Rather, I argue that Theodore does acknowledge christological prophecies, as distinct from both retrospective accommodation and typology. Further, a careful reading of Cyril’s Commentary on the Twelve limits the prospective christological revelation he ascribes to the prophets and reveals the positive role he grants the Mosaic law prior to Christ’s advent. My thesis secondly explores the Christian significance both Theodore and Cyril assign to Israel’s exile and restoration, the pivotal event to which the Twelve bear witness. I here argue that Theodore’s reading of the Twelve Prophets, while not attempting to be christocentric, is nevertheless self-consciously Christian. Cyril, unsurprisingly, offers a robust Christian reading of the Twelve, yet this too must be expanded by his focus on the church and concern to equip the church through the ethical paideusis provided by the plain sense of the prophetic text. Revised descriptions of each interpreter lead to the claim that the label “christocentric” obscures more than it clarifies and polarizes no less than earlier accounts of Antiochene/Alexandrian exegesis. I advocate rather for an approach that takes seriously Theodore’s positive account of the unity and telos of the divine economy and the full range of Cyril’s interpretation, in order to move beyond a zero-sum assessment and offer instead a positive account that appreciates the strengths of each Christian reading of the Twelve.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCyril of Alexandriaen_US
dc.subjectTheodore of Mopsuestiaen_US
dc.subjectPatristic exegesisen_US
dc.subjectMinor Prophetsen_US
dc.subjectProphecyen_US
dc.subjectChristologyen_US
dc.subjectSalvation historyen_US
dc.subjectIsraelen_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectFifth centuryen_US
dc.subjectFourth centuryen_US
dc.subject.lccBS1560.O63
dc.subject.lcshBible. Minor Prophets--Commentariesen_US
dc.subject.lcshTheodore, Bishop of Mopsuestia, ca. 350-428 or 9en_US
dc.subject.lcshCyril, Saint, Patriarch of Alexandria, ca. 370-444en_US
dc.titleThe Twelve between two testaments : the Minor Prophets as Christian scripture in the commentaries of Theodore of Mopsuestia and Cyril of Alexandriaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2022-12-18en_US
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Electronic copy restricted until 18th December 2022en_US


The following licence files are associated with this item:

  • Creative Commons

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted within the work, this item's licence for re-use is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International