Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorShuker, David M.
dc.contributor.authorCurrie, Niall
dc.contributor.authorHoole, Tara
dc.contributor.authorBurdfield-Steel, Emily R.
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-16T11:01:01Z
dc.date.available2015-02-16T11:01:01Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.identifier.citationShuker , D M , Currie , N , Hoole , T & Burdfield-Steel , E R 2015 , ' The extent and costs of reproductive interference among four species of true bug ' , Population Ecology , vol. 57 , no. 2 , pp. 321-331 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-014-0470-1en
dc.identifier.issn1438-3896
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 164160215
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a41eca94-8ea5-4328-90d1-4aaf9fdfadfb
dc.identifier.otherBibtex: urn:bafc48aba9d09f751639a1823eef08d2
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000356776800007
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84933183315
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/6103
dc.descriptionERB-S is supported by a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) studentship and DMS was in part supported by a NERC Advanced Fellowship.en
dc.description.abstractReproductive interference arises when individuals of one species engage in reproductive activities with individuals of another, leading to fitness costs in one or both species. Reproductive interference (RI) therefore has two components. First, there must be mis-directed mating interactions. Second, there must be costs associated with these mis-directed interactions. Here we consider RI between four species of true bug in the family Lygaeidae, focusing in particular on the fitness consequences to Lygaeus equestris. The species we consider vary in their relationships with each other, including species in the same or different genus, and with or without natural overlap in their geographic ranges. First we show that inter-specific mating interactions, although not a certain outcome, are common enough to perhaps influence mating behaviour in these species (arising in up to 10 % of inter-specific pairings). Second, we show that reproductive interference can seriously reduce female fitness in L. equestris. Importantly, different species impose different costs of RI on L. equestris, with interactions with male Spilostethus pandurus inflicting fitness costs of similar magnitude to the costs of mating with con-specifics. On the other hand, mating interactions with male Oncopeltus fasciatus appear to have no effect on female fitness. In a follow-up experiment, when we allowed competition amongst just females of S. pandurus and L. equestris, the fitness of the latter was not reduced, arguing more strongly for the role of reproductive interference. However, in our final experiments under mass mating conditions with extended ecological interactions (including scope for competition for resources and cannibalism), the costs of RI were less apparent. Our data therefore suggest that the costs of RI will be context-specific and may act in concert with, or be swamped by, other ecological effects. We suggest that comparative studies of this sort that both mimic naturally occurring reproductive interference events, and also artificially generate new ones, will be necessary if we are to better understand the ecological and evolutionary significance of reproductive interference.
dc.format.extent11
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPopulation Ecologyen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.en
dc.subjectMating behaviouren
dc.subjectLygaeidaeen
dc.subjectSexual conflicten
dc.subjectSexual selectionen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleThe extent and costs of reproductive interference among four species of true bugen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-014-0470-1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record