Files in this item
What are shared and social values of ecosystems?
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Kenter, J.O. | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Brien, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hockley, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ravenscroft, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fazey, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Irvine, K.N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Reed, M.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Christie, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brady, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bryce, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Church, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cooper, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Davies, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Evely, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Everard, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fish, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fisher, J.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jobstvogt, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Molloy, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Orchard-Webb, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ranger, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ryan, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Watson, V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-16T10:31:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-16T10:31:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kenter , J O , O'Brien , L , Hockley , N , Ravenscroft , N , Fazey , I , Irvine , K N , Reed , M S , Christie , M , Brady , E , Bryce , R , Church , A , Cooper , N , Davies , A , Evely , A , Everard , M , Fish , R , Fisher , J A , Jobstvogt , N , Molloy , C , Orchard-Webb , J , Ranger , S , Ryan , M , Watson , V & Williams , S 2015 , ' What are shared and social values of ecosystems? ' , Ecological Economics , vol. 111 , pp. 86-99 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0921-8009 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 168623358 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: bef91113-0f03-4404-ab0a-44fe1f9a8640 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 84922350009 | |
dc.identifier.other | WOS: 000350777800009 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-8982-7471/work/52888775 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/6102 | |
dc.description | The theoretical framework outlined in this paper was developed initially through a series of expert workshops as part of the Valuing Nature Network — BRIDGE: From Values to Decisions project, funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). It was developed further through the follow-on phase of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment (Work Package 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values) funded by the UK Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Welsh Government, NERC, the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), and the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). | en |
dc.description.abstract | Social valuation of ecosystem services and public policy alternatives is one of the greatest challenges facing ecological economists today. Frameworks for valuing nature increasingly include shared/social values as a distinct category of values. However, the nature of shared/social values, as well as their relationship to other values, has not yet been clearly established and empirical evidence about the importance of shared/social values for valuation of ecosystem services is lacking. To help address these theoretical and empirical limitations, this paper outlines a framework of shared/social values across five dimensions: value concept, provider, intention, scale, and elicitation process. Along these dimensions we identify seven main, non-mutually exclusive types of shared values: transcendental, cultural/societal, communal, group, deliberated and other-regarding values, and value to society. Using a case study of a recent controversial policy on forest ownership in England, we conceptualise the dynamic interplay between shared/social and individual values. The way in which social value is assessed in neoclassical economics is discussed and critiqued, followed by consideration of the relation between shared/social values and Total Economic Value, and a review of deliberative and non-monetary methods for assessing shared/social values. We conclude with a discussion of the importance of shared/social values for decision-making. | |
dc.format.extent | 14 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ecological Economics | en |
dc.rights | © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en |
dc.subject | Shared values | en |
dc.subject | Social values | en |
dc.subject | Ecosystem services | en |
dc.subject | Environmental valuation | en |
dc.subject | Total Economic Value | en |
dc.subject | Deliberation | en |
dc.subject | Deliberative monetary valuation | en |
dc.subject | Non-monetary valuation | en |
dc.subject | Interpretive methods | en |
dc.subject | Psychological methods | en |
dc.subject | Decision-making | en |
dc.subject | GE Environmental Sciences | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject | BDC | en |
dc.subject | R2C | en |
dc.subject.lcc | GE | en |
dc.title | What are shared and social values of ecosystems? | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Geography & Sustainable Development | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Development | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.