Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorVan Der Post, Daniel Job
dc.contributor.authorVerbrugge, Rineke
dc.contributor.authorHemelrijk, Charlotte
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-03T15:31:03Z
dc.date.available2015-02-03T15:31:03Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-28
dc.identifier.citationVan Der Post , D J , Verbrugge , R & Hemelrijk , C 2015 , ' The evolution of different forms of sociality : behavioral mechanisms and eco-evolutionary feedback ' , PLoS One , vol. 10 , no. 1 , e0117027 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117027en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 165403299
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 2e0b1583-5ec0-4e8c-bd92-b6e8a33e6200
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84922422675
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000348732100058
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/6059
dc.descriptionThis research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (http://www.nwo.nl/en): Vici grant NWO-277-80-001 awarded to Rineke Verbrugge (in the project Cognitive systems in interaction: Logical and computational models of higher-order social cognition). Date of Acceptance: 17/12/2014en
dc.description.abstractDifferent forms of sociality have evolved via unique evolutionary trajectories. However, it remains unknown to what extent trajectories of social evolution depend on the specific characteristics of different species. Our approach to studying such trajectories is to use evolutionary case-studies, so that we can investigate how grouping co-evolves with a multitude of individual characteristics. Here we focus on anti-predator vigilance and foraging. We use an individual-based model, where behavioral mechanisms are specified, and costs and benefits are not predefined. We show that evolutionary changes in grouping alter selection pressures on vigilance, and vice versa. This eco-evolutionary feedback generates an evolutionary progression from “leader-follower” societies to “fission-fusion” societies, where cooperative vigilance in groups is maintained via a balance between within- and between-group selection. Group-level selection is generated from an assortment that arises spontaneously when vigilant and non-vigilant foragers have different grouping tendencies. The evolutionary maintenance of small groups, and cooperative vigilance in those groups, is therefore achieved simultaneously. The evolutionary phases, and the transitions between them, depend strongly on behavioral mechanisms. Thus, integrating behavioral mechanisms and eco-evolutionary feedback is critical for understanding what kinds of intermediate stages are involved during the evolution of particular forms of sociality.
dc.format.extent19
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen
dc.rights© 2015 van der Post et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectEvolutionen
dc.subjectGroupingen
dc.subjectForagingen
dc.subjectVigilanceen
dc.subjectCooperationen
dc.subjectMulti-level selectionen
dc.subjectMulti-scale modelen
dc.subjectIndividual-based modelen
dc.subjectArtificial lifeen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleThe evolution of different forms of sociality : behavioral mechanisms and eco-evolutionary feedbacken
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117027
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117027en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record