Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLaibe, G.
dc.contributor.authorPrice, D.J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-08T16:01:01Z
dc.date.available2014-09-08T16:01:01Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-21
dc.identifier.citationLaibe , G & Price , D J 2014 , ' Dusty gas with one fluid in smoothed particle hydrodynamics ' , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , vol. 440 , no. 3 , pp. 2147-2163 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu359en
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 146777318
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 469cc765-c88d-4d24-9070-00a275d290a2
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84898822646
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000334744000019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/5376
dc.descriptionThis work was funded via Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project grant DP1094585. GL acknowledges funding from the European Research Council for the FP7 ERC advanced grant project ECOGAL. DJP is very grateful for funding via an ARC Future Fellowship (FT130100034).en
dc.description.abstractIn a companion paper we have shown how the equations describing gas and dust as two fluids coupled by a drag term can be re-formulated to describe the system as a single-fluid mixture. Here, we present a numerical implementation of the one-fluid dusty gas algorithm using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). The algorithm preserves the conservation properties of the SPH formalism. In particular, the total gas and dust mass, momentum, angular momentum and energy are all exactly conserved. Shock viscosity and conductivity terms are generalized to handle the two-phase mixture accordingly. The algorithm is benchmarked against a comprehensive suit of problems: dustybox, dustywave, dustyshock and dustyoscill, each of them addressing different properties of the method. We compare the performance of the one-fluid algorithm to the standard two-fluid approach. The one-fluid algorithm is found to solve both of the fundamental limitations of the two-fluid algorithm: it is no longer possible to concentrate dust below the resolution of the gas (they have the same resolution by definition), and the spatial resolution criterion h < c(s)t(s), required in two-fluid codes to avoid over-damping of kinetic energy, is unnecessary. Implicit time-stepping is straightforward. As a result, the algorithm is up to ten billion times more efficient for 3D simulations of small grains. Additional benefits include the use of half as many particles, a single kernel and fewer SPH interpolations. The only limitation is that it does not capture multi-streaming of dust in the limit of zero coupling, suggesting that in this case a hybrid approach may be required.
dc.format.extent17
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyen
dc.rights© 2014 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Societyen
dc.subjectHydrodynamicsen
dc.subjectMethods: numericalen
dc.subjectProtoplanetary discsen
dc.subjectDust, extinctionen
dc.subjectQB Astronomyen
dc.subjectQC Physicsen
dc.subject.lccQBen
dc.subject.lccQCen
dc.titleDusty gas with one fluid in smoothed particle hydrodynamicsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Research Councilen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Physics and Astronomyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu359
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumberen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record