Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Michael
dc.contributor.authorLaland, Kevin Neville
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-22T15:01:04Z
dc.date.available2014-08-22T15:01:04Z
dc.date.issued2012-08
dc.identifier.citationO'Brien , M & Laland , K N 2012 , ' Genes, culture and agriculture : an example of human niche construction ' , Current Anthropology , vol. 53 , no. 4 , pp. 434-470 . https://doi.org/10.1086/666585en
dc.identifier.issn0011-3204
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 13798837
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 247b5900-c341-4fbe-9948-8d331fd8f142
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84864037632
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2457-0900/work/60630430
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/5216
dc.descriptionK. N. Laland was supported by an ERC Advanced Grant (EVOCULTURE).en
dc.description.abstractTheory and empirical data from a variety of disciplines strongly imply that recent human history involves extensive gene-culture coevolution, much of it as a direct result of human agricultural practices. Here we draw on niche-construction theory (NCT) and gene-culture coevolutionary theory (GCT) to propose a broad theoretical framework (NCT-GCT) with which archaeologists and anthropologists can explore coevolutionary dynamics. Humans are enormously potent niche constructors, and understanding how niche construction regulates ecosystem dynamics is central to understanding the impact of human populations on their ecological and developmental environments. We use as primary examples the evolution of dairying by Neolithic groups in Europe and Africa and the rise of the “sickle-cell allele” among certain agricultural groups in West Africa and suggest that these examples are broadly representative of much of human recent history. Although the core aspects of these case studies are familiar, we lay out the examples with a specific NCT-GCT focus, which allows us to highlight how archaeology, when coupled with genetic research, can play an important role in better understanding human history. Finally, we suggest that the NCT-GCT perspective is likely to be of widespread general utility because it inherently promotes consideration of the active agency of humans, and other organisms, in modifying their ecological and developmental niches and naturally draws attention to the various forms of feedback that flow from human activities at multiple levels, in multiple populations, and across multiple species.
dc.format.extent37
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Anthropologyen
dc.rightsCopyright 2012 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserveden
dc.subjectGN Anthropologyen
dc.subject.lccGNen
dc.titleGenes, culture and agriculture : an example of human niche constructionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1086/666585
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record