Files in this item
Algeria versus the Arab Spring
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Volpi, Frederic | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-12T12:01:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-12T12:01:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Volpi , F 2013 , ' Algeria versus the Arab Spring ' , Journal of Democracy , vol. 24 , no. 3 , pp. 104-115 . https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0040 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1045-5736 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 51144034 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: c1b2a326-a366-4d17-bb8d-7f4e5c2e37e3 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 84880394850 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10023/5118 | |
dc.description.abstract | What accounts for continuing authoritarian success in the Arab world today? In light of the “Arab Spring,” explanations of “authoritarian resilience” in the region clearly need to be revised. Consider the example of Algeria, which exemplifies a type of authoritarian resistance to popular challenges that is based on pseudodemocratization, redistributive patronage, and an effective use of the security apparatus. Despite its unsteady mode of authoritarian governance, the Algerian regime currently possesses the means to cope with the difficulties presented by popular uprisings. Yet it cannot survive in its current form for long, given its dwindling legitimacy, its lack of truly institutionalized mechanisms for transferring power, and the intrinsic limits of its system of patronage. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Democracy | en |
dc.rights | © 2013 National Endowment for Democracy and The Johns Hopkins University Press. | en |
dc.subject | JZ International relations | en |
dc.subject.lcc | JZ | en |
dc.title | Algeria versus the Arab Spring | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of International Relations | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0040 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.