Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorVolpi, Frederic
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-12T12:01:00Z
dc.date.available2014-08-12T12:01:00Z
dc.date.issued2013-07
dc.identifier.citationVolpi , F 2013 , ' Algeria versus the Arab Spring ' , Journal of Democracy , vol. 24 , no. 3 , pp. 104-115 . https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0040en
dc.identifier.issn1045-5736
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 51144034
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: c1b2a326-a366-4d17-bb8d-7f4e5c2e37e3
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84880394850
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/5118
dc.description.abstractWhat accounts for continuing authoritarian success in the Arab world today? In light of the “Arab Spring,” explanations of “authoritarian resilience” in the region clearly need to be revised. Consider the example of Algeria, which exemplifies a type of authoritarian resistance to popular challenges that is based on pseudodemocratization, redistributive patronage, and an effective use of the security apparatus. Despite its unsteady mode of authoritarian governance, the Algerian regime currently possesses the means to cope with the difficulties presented by popular uprisings. Yet it cannot survive in its current form for long, given its dwindling legitimacy, its lack of truly institutionalized mechanisms for transferring power, and the intrinsic limits of its system of patronage.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Democracyen
dc.rights© 2013 National Endowment for Democracy and The Johns Hopkins University Press.en
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleAlgeria versus the Arab Springen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0040
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record