Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDeacon, A.E.
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, M.
dc.contributor.authorMagurran, A.E.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-04T15:31:00Z
dc.date.available2014-07-04T15:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-12
dc.identifier.citationDeacon , A E , Barbosa , M & Magurran , A E 2014 , ' Forced monogamy in a multiply mating species does not impede colonisation success ' , BMC Ecology , vol. 14 , no. 18 , 18 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-14-18en
dc.identifier.issn1472-6785
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 130221500
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 583f25da-dc63-40df-877d-1ee851dc6606
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84903213634
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-0036-2795/work/43550275
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-0327-9580/work/60630777
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000338361100001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4952
dc.descriptionThis work was funded by a NERC scholarship to AED and a FCT postdoctoral fellowship (SFRH/BPD/82259/2011) to MB. AEM acknowledges support from the ERC (project BioTIME 250189) and the Royal Society.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: The guppy (Poecilia reticulata) is a successful invasive species. It is also a species that mates multiply; previous studies have demonstrated that this strategy carries fitness benefits. Guppies are routinely introduced to tanks and troughs in regions outside their native range for mosquito-control purposes, and often spread beyond these initial confines into natural water bodies with negative ecological consequences. Here, using a mesocosm set up that resembles the containers into which single guppies are typically introduced for mosquito control, we ask whether singly-mated females are at a disadvantage, relative to multiply-mated females, when it comes to founding a population. Treatments were monitored for one year. Results: A key finding was that mating history did not predict establishment success, which was 88% in both treatments. Furthermore, analysis of behavioural traits revealed that the descendants of singly-mated females retained antipredator behaviours, and that adult males showed no decrease in courtship vigour. Also, we detected no differences in behavioural variability between treatments. Conclusions: These results suggest that even when denied the option of multiple mating, singly-mated female guppies can produce viable populations, at least at the founder stage. This may prove to be a critical advantage in typical introduction scenarios where few individuals are released into enclosed water bodies before finding their way into natural ecosystems.
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Ecologyen
dc.rights© 2014 Deacon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectPoecilia reticulataen
dc.subjectPolyandryen
dc.subjectInvasive speciesen
dc.subjectMesocosmsen
dc.subjectPopulation viabilityen
dc.subjectQ Science (General)en
dc.subject.lccQ1en
dc.titleForced monogamy in a multiply mating species does not impede colonisation successen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Research Councilen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Fish Behaviour and Biodiversity Research Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-14-18
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84902015777&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.grantnumber250189en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record