Files in this item
Forced monogamy in a multiply mating species does not impede colonisation success
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Deacon, A.E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Barbosa, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Magurran, A.E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-04T15:31:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-04T15:31:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-06-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Deacon , A E , Barbosa , M & Magurran , A E 2014 , ' Forced monogamy in a multiply mating species does not impede colonisation success ' , BMC Ecology , vol. 14 , no. 18 , 18 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-14-18 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6785 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 130221500 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 583f25da-dc63-40df-877d-1ee851dc6606 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 84903213634 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-0036-2795/work/43550275 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-0327-9580/work/60630777 | |
dc.identifier.other | WOS: 000338361100001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/4952 | |
dc.description | This work was funded by a NERC scholarship to AED and a FCT postdoctoral fellowship (SFRH/BPD/82259/2011) to MB. AEM acknowledges support from the ERC (project BioTIME 250189) and the Royal Society. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The guppy (Poecilia reticulata) is a successful invasive species. It is also a species that mates multiply; previous studies have demonstrated that this strategy carries fitness benefits. Guppies are routinely introduced to tanks and troughs in regions outside their native range for mosquito-control purposes, and often spread beyond these initial confines into natural water bodies with negative ecological consequences. Here, using a mesocosm set up that resembles the containers into which single guppies are typically introduced for mosquito control, we ask whether singly-mated females are at a disadvantage, relative to multiply-mated females, when it comes to founding a population. Treatments were monitored for one year. Results: A key finding was that mating history did not predict establishment success, which was 88% in both treatments. Furthermore, analysis of behavioural traits revealed that the descendants of singly-mated females retained antipredator behaviours, and that adult males showed no decrease in courtship vigour. Also, we detected no differences in behavioural variability between treatments. Conclusions: These results suggest that even when denied the option of multiple mating, singly-mated female guppies can produce viable populations, at least at the founder stage. This may prove to be a critical advantage in typical introduction scenarios where few individuals are released into enclosed water bodies before finding their way into natural ecosystems. | |
dc.format.extent | 9 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Ecology | en |
dc.rights | © 2014 Deacon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Poecilia reticulata | en |
dc.subject | Polyandry | en |
dc.subject | Invasive species | en |
dc.subject | Mesocosms | en |
dc.subject | Population viability | en |
dc.subject | Q Science (General) | en |
dc.subject.lcc | Q1 | en |
dc.title | Forced monogamy in a multiply mating species does not impede colonisation success | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | European Research Council | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Biology | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Fish Behaviour and Biodiversity Research Group | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Institute | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversity | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-14-18 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84902015777&partnerID=8YFLogxK | en |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 250189 | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.