Comment: Beyond ‘evolutionary versus social’: moving the cycle shift debate forward
MetadataShow full item record
Wood, Kressel, Joshi, and Louie (2014) thoroughly evaluate the evidence for menstrual cycle shifts in ratings of several male characteristics and conclude that their analyses fail to provide supportive evidence for consistent cycle effects. The topic of menstrual cycle shifts in mate preferences has been strongly debated, with disagreements over both scientific content and practice. Here, we attempt to take a step back from these acrimonious exchanges and focus instead on how to interpret menstrual cycle shifts in mate preference tasks, independently from the question of when, or if, task performance varies with cycle stage. A greater consideration of domain-general mechanisms could provide an opportunity for investigating how evolved predispositions interact with socially transmitted information in biasing women’s responses on mate preference tasks.
Brown , G R , Cross , C P , Street , S & Brand , C O 2014 , ' Comment: Beyond ‘evolutionary versus social’: moving the cycle shift debate forward ' Emotion Review , vol 6 , no. 3 , pp. 250-251 . DOI: 10.1177/1754073914523050
This is the author's accepted manuscript, deposited in accordance with publisher policies. The published version (c) SAGE 2014 is available from http://emr.sagepub.com/
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.