Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorGarcia de la Serrana, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMareco, Edson A
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Ian A
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-15T16:01:02Z
dc.date.available2014-05-15T16:01:02Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.identifier.citationGarcia de la Serrana , D , Mareco , E A & Johnston , I A 2014 , ' Systematic variation in the pattern of gene paralog retention between the teleost superorders Ostariophysi and Acanthopterygii ' , Genome Biology and Evolution , vol. 6 , no. 4 , pp. 981-7 . https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu074en
dc.identifier.issn1759-6653
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 118748770
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 300e3fe6-0ed8-436b-8516-f4f7d2e10ab7
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 24732281
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84902951850
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7796-5754/work/47136029
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000336080700021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/4805
dc.descriptionThis work was funded by the Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland pooling initiative and Scottish Funding Council grant number HR09011.en
dc.description.abstractTeleost fish underwent whole-genome duplication around 450 Ma followed by diploidization and loss of 80-85% of the duplicated genes. To identify a deep signature of this teleost-specific whole-genome duplication (TSGD), we searched for duplicated genes that were systematically and uniquely retained in one or other of the superorders Ostariophysi and Acanthopterygii. TSGD paralogs comprised 17-21% of total gene content. Some 2.6% (510) of TSGD paralogs were present as pairs in the Ostariophysi genomes of Danio rerio (Cypriniformes) and Astyanax mexicanus (Characiformes) but not in species from four orders of Acanthopterygii (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteus aculeatus; Tetraodontiformes, Tetraodon nigroviridis; Perciformes, Oreochromis niloticus; and Beloniformes, Oryzias latipes) where a single copy was identified. Similarly, 1.3% (418) of total gene number represented cases where TSGD paralogs pairs were systematically retained in the Acanthopterygian but conserved as a single copy in Ostariophysi genomes. We confirmed the generality of these results by phylogenetic and synteny analysis of 40 randomly selected linage-specific paralogs (LSPs) from each superorder and completed with the transcriptomes of three additional Ostariophysi species (Ictalurus punctatus [Siluriformes], Sinocyclocheilus species [Cypriniformes], and Piaractus mesopotamicus [Characiformes]). No chromosome bias was detected in TSGD paralog retention. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed significant enrichment of GO terms relative to the human GO SLIM database for "growth," "Cell differentiation," and "Embryo development" in Ostariophysi and for "Transport," "Signal Transduction," and "Vesicle mediated transport" in Acanthopterygii. The observed patterns of paralog retention are consistent with different diploidization outcomes having contributed to the evolution/diversification of each superorder.
dc.format.extent7
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGenome Biology and Evolutionen
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectFish evolutionen
dc.subjectPloidyen
dc.subjectGene lossen
dc.subjectWhole-genome duplicationen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.titleSystematic variation in the pattern of gene paralog retention between the teleost superorders Ostariophysi and Acanthopterygiien
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu074
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record